Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/15/2015 8:44:12 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: QT3.14

Whoo-Hoo! My clandestine pictures of Chelsea Clinton will go on sale next week!! I’m gonna make a fortune!!


2 posted on 04/15/2015 8:47:22 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

What if someone did the same to the judge that handed down this absurd ruling.

Publish the results on the web alongside his legal opinion on the matter.


4 posted on 04/15/2015 8:54:50 PM PDT by Bobalu (If we live to see 2017 we will be kissing the ground)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Almost makes me think the tin-foil-hatters are right. Between this guy and the phone-camera people, I’m thinking I might need to buy myself a burka.


5 posted on 04/15/2015 8:54:53 PM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

So being a Peeping Tom is now reasoned?

Wow. This and other judges today have a screw loose.


7 posted on 04/15/2015 8:56:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question, Jeb Bush? The answer: NO! Rove, is a devious propagandist & enemy of Conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Is that why Anthony Weiner was seen naked in his picture window holding his..


8 posted on 04/15/2015 8:56:58 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

I don’t care what this court says, it’s voyeurism and being paid to peep. This is not what a good neighbor does who gives a damn about his neighbors feelings. I would never trust him if he lived in my area. Maybe standards are different back in his native country of Sweden


10 posted on 04/15/2015 9:06:13 PM PDT by lee martell (The sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Let me make this perfectly clear and please parrot:

Bring a hidden camera into my home and publish surreptitious photos or video, cell phone or otherwise, and the price will be unbearable.

And no, you won’t be able to prove jack.


11 posted on 04/15/2015 9:06:45 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14; All

People need to work with their state and federal lawmakers to declare themselves and their homes to be copyrighted.


12 posted on 04/15/2015 9:09:06 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Cyber-voyeurism: the cameras will be on quadcopter drones, which will fly pre-programmed routes and beam back the footage in real time. Cheap enough to abandon or crash the drone and the perp will be nowhere in sight, in fact could be on the other side of the world as long as he has a confederate in the local area to manage the snooper drones.


14 posted on 04/15/2015 9:24:32 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
Man looking in a window at a woman = man is a peeping tom.
Woman looking in a window at a man = man is a flasher.
16 posted on 04/15/2015 9:39:19 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

start selling pictures taken inside the homes of judges, cops, and various govt types and you’ll see this rule change immediately


17 posted on 04/15/2015 9:48:25 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

His use of a telephoto lens should have made it illegal, even though it may be art.


18 posted on 04/15/2015 9:54:25 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
I thought this was settled years ago...


20 posted on 04/15/2015 9:59:39 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

If its visible from public areas, its legal. Black letter and it should be. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy

This includes children or adults at a playground, park, beach or other areas open or visible to the public.

Its not a tech issue.


21 posted on 04/15/2015 10:01:54 PM PDT by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Well, yeah. What’s been legalized for surveillance is legal for anyone to do.


23 posted on 04/15/2015 10:03:05 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

IF you don’t want to see photos of YOU doing something WRONG....

THEN; don’t something wrong..

-and/OR- vote for people for Tort Reform..


27 posted on 04/15/2015 10:22:32 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

It is legal.


33 posted on 04/15/2015 10:37:14 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

D’oh, if you want privacy, close the blinds.


40 posted on 04/16/2015 2:27:05 AM PDT by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson