Posted on 04/04/2015 7:44:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
That's probably the best way to handle it, really. It's honest, but it isn't specific.
Why do we have to pass a law to protect natural rights?
Because other laws have been passed that destroyed natural rights.
The Civil Rights Laws destroyed natural rights, specifically, the Freedom of Association.
Bump that.
Cruz baby! Woot!
Amen Boss.
You stay out of my church and heaven and I will stay out of your lives.
looks like a cake for tag team wrestlers. LOL
If it really came down to it, wouldn’t it be possible for everyone to be a “Sam’s Club” type of operation? You have to join. And when joining you have to accept the principle of the establishment to participate
You must bow, or be banned. That is the liberal fascist message.
LIKE!
Homosexuals are trying to embed themselves into federal civil rights laws. As of now federal law bars discrimination for categories of race, color, religion, sex and national origin, and there have been recent additions concerning conditions for age, pregnancy, disability.
But nowhere in federal law is there a category for sexual orientation.
There are executive orders and actions relevant to sexual orientation but no federal legislative law.
As I’ve posted for going on 10 years now, this battle is ultimately an attack on the Church and now we see it clearly as such.
There is a solid way to defeat the social tyranny of the courts and it does not involve any branch of the federal government.
Definitely! Less than 2% of the population should not dictate to the other 98+%.
Go, Cruz, GO!!
At this point in time, I agree wholeheartedly with these comments.
Wish we could have a poll here like we once did. My reading of the board tells me that Ted would be in the 90’s. I would like to be proven right.
An important clarification: Not "different laws for different people", but "different laws for favored groups".
I am a stickler for using the right word.
Rant
verb (used without object) 1. to speak or declaim extravagantly or violently; talk in a wild or vehement way; rave: The demagogue ranted for hours. verb (used with object) 2. to utter or declaim in a ranting manner. noun 3. ranting, extravagant, or violent declamation. 4. a ranting utterance.
"Rant" (and rave) carries a connotation of one being a bit unhinged up to insane. There is a difference between speaking passionately, clearly and precisely and ranting.
fwiw
True (if they have the proper ideology)
Go, Cruz, GO!!
Right on, right on, right on!
As will I.”
I won’t adhere to this new world. I will adhere to God’s word.”
Amen! We already have a Leader who is infallible and we need to follow Him even if it means death. Material and worldly things are insignificant beside our souls. Even death would be gain for us. We can’t lose if we are faithful.
I have a dream that one day crimes against nature laws will be reinstated for predatory sodomites. For the sake of our children I pray each and every day that this dream comes true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.