Skip to comments.
New Justice Dept. policy allows authorities to seize suspicious bank accounts
The Washington Times ^
| March 31, 2015
| Maggie Ybarra
Posted on 03/31/2015 3:50:21 PM PDT by jazusamo
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has crafted a new policy that would allow government officials to seize bank accounts involved in financial structuring schemes prior to filing criminal charges against the individuals who own those accounts.
The new policy stems from the Justice Departments ongoing review of its asset forfeiture program. The policy is aimed at preventing criminals from making a series of currency transactions under a certain monetary threshold in order to evade reporting the transaction to the authorities, according to a department statement.
Those types of transactions typically lead to the most serious illegal banking transactions and occur in connection with other criminal activity, the statement read.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assetforfeiture; bankaccounts; doj; financialstructuring; holder; moneylaundering; policestate; seizure; thugocracy; tyranny; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
With a Justice Department headed by liberal leftists like Eric Holder or Loretta Lynch what could possibly go wrong? /s
1
posted on
03/31/2015 3:50:21 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Obama and his admin are not leaving
2
posted on
03/31/2015 3:51:27 PM PDT
by
molson209
(Blank)
To: jazusamo
The policy is aimed at preventing... ...non-Democrats from having bank accounts with anything in them.
3
posted on
03/31/2015 3:52:29 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and th<uere is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Exactly...Of course they have to return the confiscated bank accounts if the don’t file charges within 150 days, this is a blank check for the commie Rats.
4
posted on
03/31/2015 3:55:15 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: jazusamo
NO matter how corrupt they have been,
the Obama Administration CONTINUES
to erode every right once protected
by the (RIP) US Constitution.
5
posted on
03/31/2015 3:55:57 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: jazusamo
I thought they were already doing this. I heard a man on a talk show who owned a gun store and had his account seized , over $100,000.
6
posted on
03/31/2015 3:56:57 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: jazusamo
Obama/Holder don’t need no steenking Constitution!
7
posted on
03/31/2015 3:58:07 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: molson209
0bama will sign an EO making him president until the crisis they created is over ....
8
posted on
03/31/2015 3:58:12 PM PDT
by
SkyDancer
(I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am ...)
To: Liz; WildHighlander57; maggief
Shame it’s not used on Hill/Billy
9
posted on
03/31/2015 3:58:40 PM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now?)
To: jazusamo
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward. ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
10
posted on
03/31/2015 3:58:43 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://www.tedcruz.org/donate/)
To: conservativejoy
You’re referring to the DOJ Operation Choke Point that was started in 2013, this is supposed to be a new program.
11
posted on
03/31/2015 4:00:11 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: jazusamo
Take a Mayo Jar and wash it out, then take some white latex house paint or killz and put in about 1/8-1/4 cup of it the jar and shake the jar, wait 5 mins, remove the lid and rinse the paint off the lid, then use butte knife scrape some paint off around the neck of the jar, leave jar open to dry for a day or two. Then sore cash in it in the refrigerator.
You can also bury these in the back yard.
12
posted on
03/31/2015 4:01:39 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
To: conservativejoy
I thought they were already doing this. The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (or BSA, or otherwise known as the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act) requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering.
Specifically, the act requires financial institutions to keep records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments, and file reports of cash purchases of these negotiable instruments of more than $10,000 (daily aggregate amount), and to report suspicious activity that might signify money laundering, tax evasion, or other criminal activities.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_Secrecy_Act
13
posted on
03/31/2015 4:04:07 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: jazusamo
"a new policy that would allow government officials to seize bank accounts involved in financial structuring schemes prior to filing criminal charges against the individuals who own those accounts. "
What happens if no charges are filed, or the person is found innocent....
Oh well, too bad the government has no obligation to return the property or compensate the accused for their inconvenience...
Welcome to your police state.
14
posted on
03/31/2015 4:04:26 PM PDT
by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
To: GraceG
Absolutely! We here in the west have to use this though. ;-)
15
posted on
03/31/2015 4:08:02 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: Jim Robinson
Absolutely no chance of any abuse of this program. These people are pure as the wind driven snow.
To: jazusamo; All
Not only has the Supreme Court historically clarified that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate commerce, but the Court has also clarified the following limit concerning Congresss constitutional Commerce Clause (1.8.3) powers.
Since banking is based on contracts (corrections welcome), not commerce, Congresss Commerce Clause powers do not extend to regulating contracts, even if such contracts are negotiated across state borders.
-
State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]. Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
-
4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce [emphasis added] within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract of indemnity against loss. Paul v. Virginia, 1869.
So if the corrupt Justice Department wants to seize suspicious bank accounts, and it may have reasonable cause to do so in certain cases, then it needs to comply with the 4th Amendment.
To: molson209
I will withdraw and deposit "suspiciously" every day until they unconstitutionally seize those assets. Afterwards, a grand jury of citizens can indict Holder by name for violating my civil rights.
I will not accept anything less than life imprisionment performing hard labor.
How much is Trey Gowdy's hourly rate? Let's do this.
18
posted on
03/31/2015 4:23:14 PM PDT
by
Rodamala
To: jazusamo
The Nazis effectively seized control of industries.
Nothing new here.
19
posted on
03/31/2015 4:26:39 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
To: Amendment10
Amendment? Schmendment! We don’t need your stinking amendment!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson