"and Death to America!"
Posted on 03/27/2015 10:23:26 AM PDT by illiac
LAUSSANE, Switzerland—The Obama administration is giving in to Iranian demands about the scope of its nuclear program as negotiators work to finalize a framework agreement in the coming days, according to sources familiar with the administration’s position in the negotiations.
U.S. negotiators are said to have given up ground on demands that Iran be forced to disclose the full range of its nuclear activities at the outset of a nuclear deal, a concession experts say would gut the verification the Obama administration has vowed would stand as the crux of a deal with Iran.
Until recently, the Obama administration had maintained that it would guarantee oversight on Tehran’s program well into the future, and that it would take the necessary steps to ensure that oversight would be effective. The issue has now emerged as a key sticking point in the talks.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
Hopefully, any deal struck will expire at noon 20 January 2017, as the Iranians have been notified.
A deserter who was a convert to Islam. From a family who had converted to Islam.
I am now convinced that's why Bergdahl was so important. He was a Muslim!
Iran wants the sanctions lifted.
So far as the US is concerned, that's the job of Congress.
And, right now, I don't think Congress is going to lift them.
“So far as the US is concerned, that’s the job of Congress.”
Does that mean if Obama signs off on this without senate approval could congress without the President’s blessing increase the sanctions?
it is good that America has finally learned to check its privilege by allowing the developing world to obtain nuclear weapons. Iran should have every right to act against America as it pleases for the transgressions America has committed against it. /s
I think the sanctions are already such that we don't sell Iran anything, nor do we buy anything from them.
why don’t they toss in the last hundred bad guys at gitmo.
"and Death to America!"
Did you expect any different?
To defend oneself, one must prove moral superiority to one’s assailant. If there is any moral equivalency, why you just let yourself get kilt to atone for your sins./s
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
