Posted on 03/19/2015 10:13:51 AM PDT by raptor22
mailgate: Spokesperson Jen Psaki now says that the State Department has no record of Hillary Clinton signing Form OF-109, and it could find no record of Colin Powell or Condoleezza Rice signing it either. Why check that?
'We have reviewed Secretary Clinton's official personnel file and administrative files and have no record of her signing the OF-109," Psaki said Tuesday, not bothering to explain why that seemingly simple check wasn't done earlier.
Of course, there's no evidence or statement from Hillary that she did not sign the form, though Psaki added, "I think we are fairly certain she did not sign the form."
A signed OF-109 form would, as we have noted, be Exhibit A in a perjury trial. That would be motive enough, we think, for such a document to have found its way to the nearest paper-shredder, and there would be no way of proving such a documents ever existed.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
CULTURE OF CORRUPTION PING
Stupid assertion as is the assumption it might have fallen into a paper shredder, which a bit myopic and uncreative.
Documents are scanned, indexed and stored electronically these days.
Go to any major company and that is true.
Follow the court case of just about anyone, in a major city and their docs are available electronically. (I know, because I have following the cases of a friend, who just can’t make the right decisions in life. He’s an idiot savante and I’m being generous)
I can’t believe a government that imposes Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank and HIPPA doesn’t require electronic storage of vital docs...
Whoa!!! Don’t say crap like that.
Psaki is my entree to Harf...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.