Posted on 03/04/2015 5:49:36 AM PST by raptor22
Scandal: The former secretary of state's use of a personal account to exclusively conduct government business and to protect her political future in violation of the law ought to disqualify her from the presidency.
'Witch hunts" sometimes find a witch, and those who dismissed the establishment of the House Benghazi Select Committee, chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., as just another witch hunt are eating their words.
The existence of a personal account that Hillary Clinton used to conduct government business as secretary of state was discovered by the committee and reported by the New York Times.
Clinton's use of this personal account explains why investigations of the Benghazi terrorist attack and her culpability in our diplomatic mission's vulnerability there, the failure to heed warnings and the cover-up afterward failed to find much email evidence of her direct involvement.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...
Follow up on the subject. Basically, LOL. Does anybody believe that a mere email issue would put a stop to the hildebeast express? These lyin’, cheatin’, socialist, trash heaps are just doing what they do with no fear of consequences. To them it’s just standard operating procedure.
anyone who supports Hillary is knowingly supporting a criminal. But then again, most politicians are criminals as those in DC have so proved.
If fiurged out the HDR right away.What happened at 22 is that when she became a communist?
when you’re already doing the Nixon thing before you’ve even taken the oath...
I would put Hillary up against Obama any day. Hillary is evil personified.
One would think the 920 GOP FBI files in her possession would have disqualified her back in the 1990’s from being anything other than a convicted felon.
In a perfect world, maybe.
Meanwhile, in the Watergate era, didn’t Charles Colson go to prison for having just one FBI file in his possession?
Blumenthal while not a government employee (apparently from reports I read)may have had email exchanges that involved State Department or other Government security information over that private non-secure account.
Hillary needs to account for such illegal activity.
Now for some interesting questions: WHO was her system administrator? Did he have remote access? What security clearance level did he have, given that some of her emails probably contained sensitive information, if not top secret and beyond?
If
1) She DID NOT HAVE a State Dept email address, as has been reported, and
2) Her email address was non-governmental, then
EVERYBODY in the Obama Administration who had occasion to want to send her an email would be aware that she had an illegal private email account.
Let’s get Issa on the case right now!...that’ll strike fear in’em! /s
Yes, that's an interesting observation. Anybody sending her email from their official .gov acct would leave an audit trail showing that official business was conducted with a private account. So everybody sending her email to that private account would have needed to have done so from THEIR OWN private account.
Several FReepers convinced me that the Chicago Mob has info on Arkancides which gives them mutually assured destruction with the Clinton Crime Family.
That is a good explanation why the Clintons did not use their vaunted private detective operation to spill the beans on Obama's fake life story in 2008.
This is more of the democrat party Kulture of Krime and Korruption.
Her top staffers used those Clinton email addresses at the agency, said the source, who has worked with Clinton in the past. The source named two staffers in particular, Philippe Reines and Huma Abedin, who are said to have used private email addresses in the course of their agency duties. Reines served as deputy assistant secretary of state, and Abedin as Clintons deputy chief of staff. Both rank among Clintons most loyal confidantes, in and out of the State Department.
We were able to independently verify that Abedin used a ClintonEmail.com address at some point in time. There are several email addresses associated with Abedins name in records maintained by Lexis-Nexis; one of them is huma@clintonemail.com. An email sent to that address today went through without bouncing.
(snip)
The use of private email addresses may explain the State Departments puzzling response to several FOIA requests filed by Gawker in the past two years. One of our requests, in September 2012, sought correspondence between Reines and a variety of reporters, including former BuzzFeed reporter Michael Hastings, who engaged in a profanity-flecked exchange with Reines in 2012. That request was confoundingly denied on the grounds that the State Department had no record of Reineswhose job it was to communicate with reportersemailing Hastings or any other journalists (Gawker is currently appealing the rejection). Another request in June 2011 sought Abedin's email correspondence; the State Department rejected that one as well, although we could not immediately locate the denial letter to determine on what grounds.
Sept. 24, 2012
Hillary Clinton Aide Tells Reporter To F*** Off And Have A Good Life
As the State Departments story about what happened in Benghazi crumbles, Clintons personal spokesperson, Philippe Reines, loses his temper. Have a good day. And by good day I mean F*** Off.
From gawker:
“...There are several email addresses associated with Abedins name in records maintained by Lexis-Nexis; one of them is huma@clintonemail.com. An email sent to that address today went through without bouncing. ...”
I wonder if it still works?
Hmmm... what should we say?
Ask if one of Weiners sexting partners has been sexting with another pol, allegedly.
;)
Ask what she did with her share of $6 billion
...and every other govt. employee, foreign govt. person, and anyone else who received an email from her......
.
eMailgate Disqualifies Hillary Clinton For POTUS
"One would think the 920 GOP FBI files in her possession would have disqualified her back in the 1990s from being anything other than a convicted felon.
"In a perfect world, maybe...
"Meanwhile, in the Watergate era, didnt Charles Colson go to prison for having just one FBI file in his possession?"
Answer: YES.
Check out article, then #74, and other comments.
Thanks Maggie, and WH.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.