Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Florida Man Charged With Growing Marijuana, Found Not Guilty (Jury Nullification)
NBC Miami ^ | March 03, 2015 | Keith Jones

Posted on 03/03/2015 10:55:54 PM PST by Ken H

A South Florida man charged with growing marijuana he claims he needs for a medical condition was found not guilty Monday.

Jesse Teplicki, 50, had been charged with manufacturing cannabis and was facing up to five years behind bars.

"This case is about medical marijuana and for the hundreds of thousands of patients who can use this medicine as an alternative," Teplicki said.

It took jurors just 30 minutes to return the verdict.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcmiami.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: biggov4pot; bigpot; cannabis; jurynullification; libtards4regulate; libtards4tax; marijuana; medicalfraud; medicalmjfraud; medicalpotfraud; pot; pot4biggov; potisopium4thepeople; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: RginTN

If you were to buy carrots, how many plants would you buy?

How about asparagus?

Brussel sprouts?

Okra?

I buy a couple of frozen bags - each containing meat from dozens of plants.

Nothwithstanding the number of plants, pot is illegal and veggies aren’t.


21 posted on 03/04/2015 2:22:54 AM PST by Principled (Government Slowdown using the budget process!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

First off I do NOT like or use mind altering drugs, including alcohol.

With that said I used to support the WOD... BIG MISTAKE!

I now know that the War on ‘Drugs’ was and still is a a ‘Gateway Law’ or legislation that has eviscerated a major portion of the bill of rights and the first ten amendments to the constitution.

The War on Drugs legislation left America and it’s citizens open to the “War on Terrorism” and the terrible legislation that followed it.

So now a days we have ‘civil forfeiture’ for having too much cash, theft of homes and property for having ‘drugs’ on it or being used by people there. We all know or of heard of unscrupulous law ‘enforcement’ planting ‘evidence’ and stealing cars, homes... ranches, even whole small businesses have been wiped out by these tactics.

So to make a long post shorter let’s just say that I approve of this Jury nullification and hope that many, many more follow in it’s tracks.


22 posted on 03/04/2015 2:46:36 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I’ve seen the movie PineApple Express and know what’s needed for personal use and for sale ;)


23 posted on 03/04/2015 2:48:43 AM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RginTN
He had 46 marijuana plants...yeah right it was all for his personal use!!

My best friend needed a liver transplant several years ago. This was a debilitating medical condition, both before and after the operation. He spent many years on disability. Before he became ill he was an excellent engineer and in the top 5%, maybe higher, of wage earners.

Afterwards, he was poor. Grinding, life-sucking poverty. He did not use, or need medical marijuana for his condition. But I would never question the decision of a very ill person to grow a little extra so as to relieve both the symptoms of the disease and his financial needs.

What good does it do to help relieve the physical pain if we leave the patient in poverty? There are no cartels, no DOJ gun-smuggling operations, and no real harm to the US. Give him a little room to both relieve his pain and take care of his other needs.

I applaud the jury decision.

24 posted on 03/04/2015 3:09:27 AM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RginTN
"I've seen the movie PineApple Express and know what's for personal use and for sale;)"

If you watched a Cheech & Chong movie you'd know 56 plants is about one day's stock.

25 posted on 03/04/2015 5:29:56 AM PST by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

There is attempting to keep people from violating the rights of others, such as prohibiting rape and murder, and there is attempting to control people for their own good. There is nothing incompatible between liberty and prohibiting people from violating the rights of others. The other, not so much.


26 posted on 03/04/2015 6:31:16 AM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Hmm.. A better option for the jury would have been to find him not guilty on the marijuana charges, but slap him with a fine for lying to the court. 46 plants is not one person’s medi-marijuana stash. No possible way.


27 posted on 03/04/2015 7:13:27 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
We should all look to the profound wisdom of Colorado. It’s just working out so well for them.

Yes, it is ... or do you have information to the contrary?

28 posted on 03/04/2015 8:41:09 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
the War on ‘Drugs’ was and still is a a ‘Gateway Law’

Nicely put!

29 posted on 03/04/2015 8:43:18 AM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I remember Florida....Anywhere anyone stopped to clean seeds out of their weed and threw them on the ground, you’d find a patch of weed.


30 posted on 03/04/2015 12:43:41 PM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

The curious part of your response is that you’re actually serious.


31 posted on 03/04/2015 2:26:36 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
The curious part of your response is that you wasted your time and FR's bandwidth on posting such nothing.
32 posted on 03/04/2015 2:28:19 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo CM54Marijuana-Not-Crack-Posters.jpg

Less Than $900 To Go!!
Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Fight !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


33 posted on 03/04/2015 2:32:03 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You mad, n00b ?


34 posted on 03/04/2015 2:34:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“Since marijuana legalization, highway fatalities in Colorado are at near-historic lows” - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3190602/posts

“Colorado Teens Smoking Less Pot Since Legalization” - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3190690/posts

“Six Months After Legalizing Marijuana, Two Big Things Have Happened in Colorado” - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3175168/posts: “According to government data, the Denver city- and county-wide murder rate has dropped 52.9% since recreational marijuana use was legalized”


35 posted on 03/04/2015 2:34:56 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Better put some ice on that.
36 posted on 03/04/2015 2:35:35 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Ah, a n00b pothead who seriesly (sic) thinks he can win an argument on dope.


37 posted on 03/04/2015 2:37:38 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I've posted facts, you've posted bluster - if you want to think you're winning, have fun with that.
38 posted on 03/04/2015 2:40:04 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

Good post


39 posted on 03/04/2015 2:43:35 PM PST by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You’ve posted highly subjective talking points. The only thing stupider than smoking dope is arguing with potheads online. Have a good one, bro.


40 posted on 03/04/2015 2:56:02 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson