The only thing I fear is that we will again have no choice in this election because The Cheap Labor Express has paid for a amnesty candidate and will get it.
“Fear” isn’t the term I would use. More like “disgusted.”
Jeb too believes in radically changing this country.
Anyone with a brain should fear a third generation of Bushes.
The “far right” does not “fear Jeb Bush; it revulses at the prospect of having him chosen as the GOP candidate.
I will say it again: Jeb Bush will deliver the worst electoral defeat the GOP has seen in a generation, potentially doubling Mitt’s sit-out rate. He has as much appeal as used food.
And the far left pray for it.
Toenail fungus polls better than Jeb Bush amongst common sense conservatives and for good reason.
Turning down $10 of spending cuts because it came with $1 of tax increases would be pretty stupid, unless the candidate is against spending cuts, like a Dem.
It showed what a circus the GOP primary was in 2011.
The only thing I fear about Jeb Bush is the high percentage of the Conservative base that will stay home on election day if he gets the nomination. Me included.
You mean “Success” like the other two Bushes?
Taxes needs to be at 19% GDP.
Spending needs to be at 17% GDP.
The two percent differential needs to be used to pay down the debt.
What happens is the Liberal wing of our party run’s one Amnesty loving big spender while we have 5 to 7 actual conservatives in the race. The liberal win’s 18% and gets all delegates under “winner take all” eventhough 82% of the party rejects the amnesty lover. The media writes it up “Bush wins again!!”
Let's see. One resigned in disgrace. The other lost in disgrace, and third would NEVER have campaigned on tax increases. Never. If these turds in DC can point to one time where Reagan campaigned on higher taxes, I'd like to hear it.
In fact, he reluctantly signed on to one of these failed plans where taxes went up now for future promised cuts, and it was a horrible mistake. His decision to do it and GHWB's raised taxes are the very reason no candidate president would or should agree to such fascicle deals now. It's taxes now for non-existent cuts later. Cut 10% this year, and maybe a tax increase could be traded. Maybe.
Oprime número tres por inglés.
Uh, no.
How many times must Lucy pull the ball away at the last moment before Charlie Brown figures out that he's been duped?
Even if "$1 in new taxes for every $10 in spending cuts" is "the deal" that is agreed to, it never, ever would work out that way. The new taxes would be permanent, while the spending cuts would never materialize. And the Demo/Comnmies and their wholly-owned subsidiary of the lamestream media would mercilessly hammer the Republicans as "tax raisers", even though the Demo/Commies would always raise taxes even more.
So, at least most Republicans understand how the rigged game works, and would not fall for it again.
No. We are just tired of the Center getting dragged further and further left. Jeb Bush is just another example of this. He would make a great moderate Democrat, but he is crappy moderate Republican.
I did not leave the Center - it left me about 30 years ago.
does Jeb thinks taxes are too low?
OK, lets raise taxes on foreign workers!
Reagan agreed to 1 dollar in taxes for every 2 dollars in cuts. They passed the taxes immediately, but somehow the cuts never happened. So why would anyone think the 10 dollars in cuts would?
The headline...taken on “face value”
is HILARIOUS!