Under Obama and the corrupt EXEMPT docile Congress,
the US gov’t is behind Iran, N. Korea and al Qaeda
in their attack on the American people, free people,
Israel, and all religions except Islam (also EXEMPT).
All I am saying is that is not the only threat out there.
America is no longer the number one manufacturer on the planet. China is now the number one manufacturer.
China is growing fast. With our manufacturing plants, in China.
Bring back American industry.
maybe a war is what is needed to get America back on track. The only problem this war will be different in that it will take place in the Middle East and the secular Islamists believe that the 12th Imam will never return until the conditions are right. Rivers of blood will flow throughout the world in this war. Keep this in mind the secular islamists are fightin what is called a pagan nomadic war against the factions that exist throughout the Islamic culture, it is not Sunni and Shitite only it is aginst the ruling elite, the educated, the uneducated, women, the West and homosexuality. The oddity here in the West homosexuality is becoming the norm and the secular Islamists will destroy the homos very quickly.
The existential threat to the USA is in the White Hut.
Face it America, nothing will be done to fight this until all leftists are out of power. Both parties.
The US IS committing suicide. I blame the government, but I also blame the people for allowing a disgraceful person to run the country and doing nothing to stop him.
We are past the pissing and moaning stage.
To complicate matters, the ally of our enemy is in the WH.
unfortunately zer0 is not as benign as dopy chamberlain. He is more like quisling
Absolutely crazy Democrats in office result in absolutely crazy policies by people who think they’re brilliant intellectual geniuses.
Absolutely amazing.
IMHO
——Building a coalition of allies is a strategy.-——
That is the problem.
The world, ie the potential members of such a coalition, has determined that Obama is truly a zero and can’t be trusted to do anything but read speeches.
Actually, he didn't. He called the enemy a "religion of peace".
He understood what happened on September 11, 2001. He did something about it.
Not nearly enough.
Two facts:
* We have no (real) money for an overseas war. None.
* Obama, and the military leadership remaining under him, would be directing that overseas war.
* The organizations and governments we would arm and empower there likely to become our enemies.
* Many, many young men you know would die for those organizations.
Solution: Get out completely. Shut the borders to all of them. Spend the defense budget on military defense of North America.
I will support total war with no idiot rules of engagement. I will not support "winning hearts and minds" nation building. We tried that and lost.
This war requires a Japanese cockroach solution just like last time only a good bit more.
No, it was a speech by President Shrub. Then he got to Baghdad and stopped to pretend he could civilize an Islamist Sunni-Shia civil war with borrowed money.
WE KNOW they’ll eventually nuke us in the future — whether or not we nuke them...
Which begs the philosophical question of pre-emptive strikes. Here’s an analogy I’ve designed. I’m interested in any critical opinion on the logic:
1. Suppose, your neighbor hates you and has a beautiful kind wife.
2. Suppose his hobby is raising a lot of rattlesnakes in his backyard.
3. Suppose there is no fence between your yard and his and there is no way to build an effective barrier.
4. Suppose he has threatened to kill you with his rattlesnakes and there’s deep grass all around your house...
5. Suppose you realize that eventually his rattlesnakes WILL kill you.
WHAT WOULD YOU DO? __________
a) Do you blow up his house including him and all the rattlesnakes and his innocent/beautiful wife?
b) Or do you wait until your certain future of death by rattlesnakes?
Clearly, it’s NOT wise for you to wait for your certain death, so your only LOGICAL choice is to nuke your neighbor.
Your dilemma is you that know that there will be innocent casualties (e.g. his beautiful/innocent wife would die in the blast), but you will not be killed in the future by him and you will rid the world of this evil man and his weapons.
THEREFORE, from a pure survival standpoint, wouldn’t it make more sense to nuke (with a Neutron Bomb) all of ISIS and all other evil factions in the Middle East? Unfortunately this would result in innocent casualties, but we know that it is a certainty that there WILL BE MANY innocent casualties in the Western world if we wait to be attacked. So we then the choice is distilled into do we want the innocent casualties to be theirs or ours?
Source: Ross Perot once mentioned the analogy of a rattlesnake in your backyard. I merely expanded upon the idea.
When the SHTF and if it does it before 2016 it might be a very long time before another D is elected to the highest office in our land.
I pray for our troops. He has shown he does not value or care for them.
Sorry. With the current pack of clowns representing our political “leadership”, the only rational and indeed only moral course of action is to do nothing.
No blood for bozos.