Posted on 02/04/2015 6:13:53 PM PST by jazusamo
The White House is poised to send a formal request to Congress asking for a new authorization to use military force against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.
The request, expected within the next week, would come days after ISIS released a video showing a caged Jordanian pilot being burned alive a further display of the groups brutality that one Republican lawmaker described Wednesday as a game-changer.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said he would be disappointed if President Obama did not make the request very soon. I do think its forthcoming, Corker said in a short interview with The Hill. I would be very surprised disappointed actually if its not here by the end of next week. And maybe sooner.
Sending an authorization for use of military force (AUMF) to Congress would open a complicated debate for the White House on war policy.
Obama has repeatedly said he will not send combat troops to Iraq to fight ISIS, even as he has increased the number of U.S. military advisers in the country.
But the White House also does not want the militarys hands tied in Iraq, and is likely to oppose any language ruling out the use of ground troops.
Democrats say any AUMF should contain a time limit for the authorization and also ban the use of U.S. ground troops in combat in Iraq and Syria.
Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) said hed have trouble supporting any AUMF that included the option of boots on the ground, and that most House Democrats feel the same way.
I would bet its a significant majority [of Democrats] would not vote for it, Yarmuth said Wednesday.
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) is another critic, saying hes very troubled by the notion of new boots on the ground in the Middle East.
Im as outraged as anybody by the atrocities by ISIS this latest murder is just unconscionable, he added. But we need to make sure that whatever response we come up with is one that is effective, and Im not convinced that another all-out war is the way to go.
Many Republicans would oppose restrictions and want an AUMF that aligns with a muscular U.S. response to ISIS.
Congressional calls for stronger action against ISIS have typically followed the groups execution of Western hostages. Since July, the group has beheaded three Americans, two Britons and two people from Japan.
The group is holding an American woman hostage. The administration has not released information on the humanitarian aid worker as part of an effort to protect her.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday there has been progress on developing AUMF language that could earn bipartisan support.
I would anticipate we would have more news on an AUMF relatively soon, he added.
Republicans on Wednesday said they were eager to debate the White Houses strategy against ISIS. Theyve grown increasingly frustrated with the administration for not sending the AUMF request, and have pointed out that Obama promised to do so at a White House meeting with Capitol Hill leaders on Jan. 13.
When we met with the president in the White House, he said it would be coming soon. His actions speak much more strongly than his words, Sen. John Barrasso (Wyo.), a member of GOP leadership who sits on the Foreign Relations Committee, said Wednesday.
Other lawmakers said the killing of the Jordanian pilot would galvanize support for a deal.
It clarifies what was clear before, which is theres going to be overwhelming congressional support for this, said Sen. Tim Kaine (Va.), the Democrat most loudly advocating for a new AUMF. The president is going to find a strong, strong supermajority of members of both houses in both parties who want to do this.
Ill have to see what the president says, but certainly what happened in Jordan and what happened in Japan has shown that were dealing with one of the most heinous groups that weve seen, and we need to take action for the protection of humanity, said Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.).
Im open to it, he added, referring to the troops-on-the-ground option.
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) told Fox Newss Americas Newsroom the killing of the pilot must be a game-changer for Obama.
Not the degrading of ISIS, not the containing of ISIS, but the destroying and crushing of ISIS has got to be the first and foremost goal, he said.
The Obama administration has used an AUMF approved just after 9/11 as the legal basis for action against ISIS, even as the president has called for it to be replaced.
Obama has authorized the deployment of 3,100 advisers to Iraq, and could order as many as 1,000 more to the Middle East to train moderate Syrian rebels.
A U.S.-led coalition has also conducted 2,264 strikes in Iraq and Syria, killing more than 6,000 ISIS fighters.
An AUMF would give Congress the opportunity to explicitly approve those efforts, as well as allow lawmakers to debate whether restrictions should be placed on the use of force.
Senate Armed Services Committee members are also calling on the administration to expedite delayed U.S. shipments of military equipment to Jordan a request that came directly from King Abdullah II, who was visiting the Capitol when the news of the pilots death broke.
Republicans have criticized the presidents strategy against ISIS as weak, and some have called for the deployment of as many as 20,000 U.S. troops to Iraq and Syria.
Jordan and other countries impacted by ISIS will look to us for leadership but we havent seen the kind of leadership we need, said Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.), an Intelligence Committee member who had planned to sit down with the Jordanian king Wednesday before his meeting was nixed.
Maybe this will be a precipitating event over at the White House, he said.
Mike Lillis contributed to this story.
“To hell with him.”
BTTT!
Stupid, knee jerk reacting fools. They never met a war they didn’t like.
This is not our fight.
...wish I had a BS flag here could post...
Here's That BS Flag For You.
I hope that the very least that we can give the Jordanians whatever they need to wipe out these vermin. I’m pretty sure that they won’t give a hoot about collateral damage or legal niceties in hunting ISIS down and sending them to Allah for their 72 Virginians.
He will continue to try and be on both sides at the same time. For every seeming decision he will counteract by further help to the other side. It’s the only way he knows. You can’t win wars by appealed to the enemy for affirmative action.
Obama "Man Up"?
That, Diana, I'm afraid is an absolute impossibility!
We need some female Israeli soldiers to show him what, ‘Manning Up’ means! ;)
I never want to hear another RAT bitch about conservatives
until they address their own with the same language.
The equipment will come back, in part, when they attack us with it.
That is NOT true. They "slipped" and released her name recently.
White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough accidentally let slip the first name of an American female aid worker being held hostage by ISIS on ABCs This Week on Sunday. http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/25/white-house-chief-of-staff-accidentally-reveals-name-of-american-female-isis-hostage/
He would use those powers t,o bomb Israel for defending itself against those sweet, innocent muzzles.
What a complete idiot, putting politics before the safety of Americans.
10's of thousands of troops left in Japan and Germany after WW2 and a few hundred left in Iraq? Really?
Seconded.
He is going to air drop millions of korans on American troops and try to convert them to the ISIL idea.
Great! thanks for the BS flag!
we need it more and more these days!....
He shouldn’t need to request anything new - the original use of force authorization after 9/11 should cover this. The idea that ISIS is some totally new thing and al Qaeda died with bin Laden is a lie; it’s just been the Democrat’s excuse to do nothing but retreat, and now waiting for more authorization is just a way to keep stalling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.