Ok so let me see if I have this right. Tillis is
against the government forcing restaurants to require that their employees wash their hands after using the bathroom, but
for the government forcing restaurants to post signs saying that their employees may or may not have washed their hands after using the bathroom?
I swear we elect idiots to Congress.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: DoodleDawg
Typhoid has to make a comeback tour don’t you know?
2 posted on
02/04/2015 6:20:54 AM PST by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: DoodleDawg
You can’t fix stupid. But it can be elected to office.
3 posted on
02/04/2015 6:21:09 AM PST by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: DoodleDawg
Shut up and sing, Mel...
4 posted on
02/04/2015 6:21:15 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: DoodleDawg
This is the problem with a phony conservative....they try and flex their conservative muscles in all the wrong places.....and end up looking like dorks.
To: DoodleDawg
Why would any Republican go there? Regardless of the merits of the political philosophy underlying the statement he should know the leftist media will present him as a kook.
To: DoodleDawg
Tillis: Restaurant workers shouldn't be forced to wash hands after bathroom breaks Is a lobotomy part of the congressional indoctrination process?
7 posted on
02/04/2015 6:23:42 AM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(OK. Now How many votes do we need to IMPEACH and REMOVE the bastard?)
To: DoodleDawg
They shouldn’t be forced by Federal statute. However they could by state statute. Problem solved.
The Federal government should not be involved in such minutiae as hand-washing by restaurant workers.
8 posted on
02/04/2015 6:24:10 AM PST by
cotton1706
(ThisRepublic.net)
To: DoodleDawg
Poppy is a little sloppy...
9 posted on
02/04/2015 6:24:41 AM PST by
thedrake
To: DoodleDawg
Tillis must be a runaway from a zoo. The man is sick in the head.
10 posted on
02/04/2015 6:25:12 AM PST by
mulligan
(I)
To: DoodleDawg
11 posted on
02/04/2015 6:25:21 AM PST by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
To: DoodleDawg
Don’t wash your hands but you will get a vaccination?
12 posted on
02/04/2015 6:27:25 AM PST by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: DoodleDawg
A law FORCING employees to wash their hands is an unenforceable law.
16 posted on
02/04/2015 6:29:21 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: DoodleDawg
> Ok so let me see if I have this right. Tillis is against the government forcing restaurants to require that their employees wash their hands after using the bathroom, but for the government forcing restaurants to post signs saying that their employees may or may not have washed their hands after using the bathroom?
I swear we elect idiots to Congress.
I’d say make them take an IQ test but we know they’d rig it for book knowledge that has little, if any, application to real life or common sense. I say take them out to a forest, dump them and strip them of their electronic devices and credit cards and see if they can last a month. If they can it will change them and they will no longer be liberals.
To: DoodleDawg
He is talking about regulatory burden. If you think about it employee hand-washing is really on the honor system. How much should the government involve itself in the regulation of employees washing their hands after using the bathroom? Should they require a bathroom monitor that inspects all the hands as employees leave the bathroom?
I think what he is saying how involved should the government be? The feds already regulate a bunch and should it really be micro-managing the act of hand-washing?
20 posted on
02/04/2015 6:30:47 AM PST by
Slyfox
(To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
To: DoodleDawg
So, this guy thinks that THIS is why he got elected?
22 posted on
02/04/2015 6:31:11 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: DoodleDawg
23 posted on
02/04/2015 6:32:46 AM PST by
King_Corey
(www.kingcorey.com -- OpenCarry.org -- http://defcad.org/)
To: DoodleDawg
"....**EEEEYARF**...hope this clowns eats at Mexican restaurants where they hire new illegals"
27 posted on
02/04/2015 6:33:23 AM PST by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: DoodleDawg
I wash my hands before I go. And after
Seriously, on the list of problems facing the Republic, this is what they pick as an issue????
30 posted on
02/04/2015 6:35:02 AM PST by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: DoodleDawg
Well, not really. This is a very, very long-standing tradition in America of something called “Sunshine Laws,” deriving from the Middle Ages and “caveat emptor,” in which it was assumed that if the consumer has information, the consumer will make the right decision. I agree it’s not pure “free market,” but it’s nothing new and was always designed as a consumer friendly process that respected consumers instead of, say, forcing them to buy seat belts.
31 posted on
02/04/2015 6:35:19 AM PST by
LS
('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
To: DoodleDawg
Good going, Tillis.
This is the typical flavor of “cray-cray” that libs will point to when trying to lure young and low-info voters.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson