Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

Well, not really. This is a very, very long-standing tradition in America of something called “Sunshine Laws,” deriving from the Middle Ages and “caveat emptor,” in which it was assumed that if the consumer has information, the consumer will make the right decision. I agree it’s not pure “free market,” but it’s nothing new and was always designed as a consumer friendly process that respected consumers instead of, say, forcing them to buy seat belts.


31 posted on 02/04/2015 6:35:19 AM PST by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LS
This is a very, very long-standing tradition in America of something called “Sunshine Laws,” deriving from the Middle Ages and “caveat emptor,” in which it was assumed that if the consumer has information, the consumer will make the right decision.

But he seems to be saying that it is the governments job to force the restaurant to disclose the information. Where is that different from the government requiring proper sanitary practices to begin with?

38 posted on 02/04/2015 6:38:20 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson