To: DoodleDawg
He is talking about regulatory burden. If you think about it employee hand-washing is really on the honor system. How much should the government involve itself in the regulation of employees washing their hands after using the bathroom? Should they require a bathroom monitor that inspects all the hands as employees leave the bathroom?
I think what he is saying how involved should the government be? The feds already regulate a bunch and should it really be micro-managing the act of hand-washing?
20 posted on
02/04/2015 6:30:47 AM PST by
Slyfox
(To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
To: Slyfox
He is talking about regulatory burden. And suggests replacing one regulation, hand washing, with another regulation, signs about hand washing. So where does that ease the burden?
To: Slyfox
OK, underneath the horsecrap, he does have a point. But with all the terrorism and Obamacare (but I repeat myself) and economic troubles we have, why pick THIS issue NOW to harp about?
What is it that makes hand-washing the number one priority for him?
28 posted on
02/04/2015 6:34:19 AM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson