Posted on 01/22/2015 10:48:06 AM PST by Kaslin
Fox News host Megyn Kelly was featured in today's New York Times Magazine in a piece titled "The Megyn Kelly Moment."
On a gray Wednesday in November, the Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly and four producers gathered around a conference table on the 17th floor of the News Corporation building in Manhattan. They were there to plan the 281st episode of The Kelly File, which would be shown live in a few hours, at 9 p.m. Kellys executive producer, Tom Lowell, a 25-year veteran of TV news, ticked through the program blocks, the between-commercial bits that are the basic unit of television programming. The A Block would contain a Fox News exclusive on the presidents plans to halt millions of deportations. The B and C Blocks would focus on the Obama health care adviser Jonathan Grubers declaration, caught on tape, that the Affordable Care Act passed in part because of the stupidity of the American voter. Slated for the D block was Jonathan Gilliam, a former Navy SEAL.
Gilliam had been Kellys idea. She saw him on Anderson Coopers CNN program a few days earlier [...]
Any word from Hustler or Playboy?/sarc
In my 20s I wondered what she'd look like naked.
In my 30s I wondered what she'd be like in bed.
In my 40's I wondered what she'd look like without makeup.
In my 50's I wondered what she'd look (and sound) like when she was mad at me.
So even though I think that Megan Kelly is a fantastically brilliant, accomplished, beautiful lady with a long list of real virtues . . . she strikes me as being WAY too high maintenance for me (not that she'd be interested in me by any means at all for many reasons).
Can you imagine being in a relationship with her and having an argument?
[shiver]
But can she make a samich ?
She and Greta (Greta also an attorney) are excellent reporters and interviewers.
Can you imagine being in a relationship with her and having an argument? —
In my 60’s I just say “Yes, Dear”
LOL!
If you read the whole article, which I strongly recommend, you will read about a very similar view of Kelly that is held by her boss Roger Ailes:
"As for Kelly, Ailes said, she had a long way to go to become one of the truly great television news talents, a distinction he reserves for Walter Cronkite, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters and, of course, Bill OReilly. But, he said, weve been on the air for 18 years. She shows up, and in one year goes to No. 2 and close to No. 1. That is an astounding accomplishment. Before this is over, she may be bigger than anybody.
“As for Kelly, Ailes said, she had a long way to go to become one of the truly great television news talents, a distinction he reserves for Walter Cronkite, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters and, of course, Bill OReilly....
***
She should feel insulted by being put into the same category as 3 propagandists and a blowhard.
I have to admit that she is a good interviewer, but her pro-homo-sexualist views told me all I need to know about her values.
Slutty
You say it like it’s a bad thing :-)
Walter Cronkite, Diane Sawyer, Barbara Walters, are all morally vacuous. They are all in their own ways very skilled a telling lies and advancing the liberal agenda, which itself is based on the three sins of lies, coveting and theft.
Agreed, and I would add to that her support of the notion of "white privilege."
Yep.
Cronkite, I think, is no longer with us, BTW. Telling his lies to the Father of Lies now, I suppose.
She’s the future of Fox News: Short skirts and farther left.
Agreed, and I would add to that her support of the notion of “white privilege.”
&&&
Good grief! I have not watched her in so long that I had not caught that one. Can’t say I am surprised, though.
Well said.
“Can you imagine being in a relationship with her and having an argument?”....
Forget about the first part, its the making up that would be pretty special.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.