Posted on 01/16/2015 12:35:49 PM PST by GIdget2004
Breaking: The US Supreme Court has agreed to take up the issue of same-sex marriage.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
I hope that's the way the USSC see it. Otherwise, what's to prevent other forms of "marriage" -- polygamy, incestuous marriage, etc.
They didn't rule that way on mixed marriages.
Yup. The same court that has already decided that there is no right to continue living unless you pay money to one of the government's crony insurance companies for the privilege of doing so.
I fear you are correct.
The case for polygamy is MUCH stronger that that for homosexuals pretending to be married.
Given the right case, you can bet on legalized polygamy very soon.
You may be right even though that really has nothing at all to do with the question before them. In order to approve gay marriage, it seems that someone would need to prove that homos are being denied a right that someone else has. There is no such right among heterosexuals. No straight person has ever had the right to marry within their own sex, therefore no such right exists to be violated.
Same here. I will be expecting maximum Judgement to fall on this nation.
We need someone to post the picture of Charlton Heston kneeling before the remains of the Statue of Liberty: “You blew it up! God damn you all to Hell!”
What liberalism hath wrought.
Go see the drudge picture. Someone has to post it here!!!
Is there a connection between beautiful New England and entire American cities turned into smoking rubble? There is.
Take same-sex marriage. I would have guessed that a “sin” city (San Francisco? Las Vegas?) would have been the first to legalize it.
Oddly it’s been the place where America started that’s wanted to be the first place to help bring about the end of America and its values! It’s been a Nor’easter of Perversion (helping to fulfill the end time “days of Lot” predicted in Luke 17) that began in (you guessed it) Boston in 2004.
New England has gone from the Mayflower Compact to the Gay Power Impact, from Providence to decadence, from Bible thumpers to God dumpers, from university to diversity to perversity, and from the land of the Great Awakening to God’s Future Shakening that will make the Boston bombings look like Walden Pond ripples by comparison!
The same Nor’easter has been spreading south and as far west as Washington State where, after swelling up with pride, Mt. Rainier may wish to celebrate shame-sex marriage by having a blast that Seaddlepated folks can share in lava-land!
The same Luke 17 prediction is tied to the Book of Revelation which speaks of the cities that God will flatten because of same-sexism - including American cities - a scenario I’ll have to accept since I can’t create my own universe and decree rules for it.
I’ve just been analyzing the world’s terminal “religion” that has its “god,” its accessories, its “rites,” and even a flag. It’s an obsession that the infected converts are willing to live for, fight for - and even die for!
Want more facts? Google “God to Same-Sexers: Hurry Up,” “Universal GAYety is Coming,” “FOR GAYS ONLY: Jesus predicted,” “ ‘Jesus Never Mentioned Homosexuality’ - When Gays Have Birthdays...,” “Harvey Milk Stamped ‘Out’ Forever” and “The Background Obama Can’t Cover Up.”
“The same Luke 17 prediction is tied to the Book of Revelation which speaks of the cities that God will flatten because of same-sexism - including American cities - a scenario I’ll have to accept since I can’t create my own universe and decree rules for it.”
Ever since ferguson started burning, I’ve been singing the following: Burn obamatowns burn!
I think we’re all reading this wrong, folks; the Supreme Court is going to rule on whether or not Supreme Court justices of the same sex can marry each other.
:)
I’m in—let’s do it! NO MARRIAGE WHATSOEVER.
which is the radical lefts whole goal
And therein lies the rub, no?: ‘to PERMIT same-sex’. If it’s a Right, there is no thought to needing a license. I was surprised the ‘logic’ in the Heller decision re: the 2nd; which is still being perverted (no pun intended) to this day.
If the 14th and the Full Faith require same-sex marriage, then, logically We the People all have Constitutional carry, any ‘licensed’ professional in one State may practice in another, illegal drivers licenses are valid in all 50 States, etc.
Eeeee....I see your point.
I agree. Especially since polygamy WAS legal at one time.
The USSC found that women have a constitutionally protected right to privacy, and that abortion falls under the right to privacy.
We may all agree that abortion has nothing to do with privacy, but that's how they ruled.
Activist justices wrongly established the so-called right to have an abortion outside the framework of the Constitution as per the following explanation.
Note that neither of the words “privacy” or “abortion” are constitutional terms. But as I indicated in my previous post, the states would have to amend the Constitution to expressly protect both privacy and abortion, imo, in order for the Supremes to be able to apply such enumerated rights to the states via the 14th Amendment.
But with all due respect to mom & pop, as a consequence of parents not making sure that their children are being taught the differences between legislative and judicial powers, the activist justices who decided Roe v. Wade got a free pass to do the following. They were able to pull the wool over the eyes of clueless state lawmakers and citizens by wrongly politically “amending” the so-called Democrat-favoring, vote-winning “rights” to privacy and abortion to the Constitution from the bench.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.