Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2015 5:40:50 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

Good, then they won’t re-elect him in 20....oh, right.


2 posted on 01/14/2015 5:42:01 PM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Hopeless or not, he'll be supported

3 posted on 01/14/2015 5:48:01 PM PST by SJackson (incompetent and feckless..the story of the Obama presidency. No hand on the f***ing tiller, Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Liberals get it: Obama is hopeless on national security everything.

There, fixed it.

4 posted on 01/14/2015 5:48:35 PM PST by SkyDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Morally corrupt liberals are smart enough to know that they’re at the top of the Muzzie headchopper list.


5 posted on 01/14/2015 5:48:52 PM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

What will they say If & When we’re attacked in NCY or DC or LA or anywhere else on a scale like Paris or larger? What excuses will they make for the Boy King then?


6 posted on 01/14/2015 5:49:15 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Has he EVER been interested in our national security?

Hey, BOR, Megyn and Sean, reload and give us your interpretation.


7 posted on 01/14/2015 5:51:15 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Two things the left is horrified to do, speak ill of Islam and speak ill of Obama. Oh wait, it’s same anyway.


8 posted on 01/14/2015 5:55:56 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Ouch!

The final paragraph is a zinger stinger.

It is going to leave a mark. History will not be kind to Obama.


9 posted on 01/14/2015 5:59:00 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Nah. They don’t get it. Read the comments at the link.


11 posted on 01/14/2015 6:02:36 PM PST by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Horse hockey!

Obama has said repeatedly that he sides with the Muslims!
That march was not pro-Muslim.


12 posted on 01/14/2015 6:02:41 PM PST by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Not to worry. In a week or two they will have forgotten all about this.


13 posted on 01/14/2015 6:11:15 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
I don't get it. Je Suis Charlie, and a big row over the Secretary of State in France. The creepy little guy said it all the time in Vietnam, can't we let bygones be bygones?
16 posted on 01/14/2015 6:29:39 PM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson


19 posted on 01/14/2015 7:15:11 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms - Open Up!" "Must be another UPS delivery, honey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
More than this, it demonstrated beyond argument that the Obama team lacks the basic instincts and judgment necessary to conduct U.S. national security policy in the next two years.

I would disagree - they know exactly what they are doing and don't give a flying fig what anyone thinks as they are sticking to the plan.

It’s simply too dangerous to let Mr. Obama continue as is—with his current team and his way of making decisions.

This could have been said five years ago however, nothing was done about it then - nothing will be done about it now.

20 posted on 01/14/2015 7:25:23 PM PST by capydick ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

I don’t think Obama could reach Hopeless even he was on a Ladder


21 posted on 01/14/2015 8:06:40 PM PST by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

You don’t send a boy to do a man’s job.


22 posted on 01/14/2015 8:56:10 PM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

” It’s simply too dangerous to let Mr. Obama continue as is .”

Agreed. Let the impeachment hearing begin.


23 posted on 01/14/2015 9:33:16 PM PST by garjog (Obama: bringing joy to the hearts of Terrorists everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson