Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Josh Earnest on Why the White House Won’t Use France’s Terminology of ‘War Against Radical Islam’
Pajamas Media ^ | 01/14/2015 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 01/14/2015 7:46:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind

White House press secretary Josh Earnest explained today why the U.S. won’t join France in declaring war on radical Islamists.

He also elaborated a bit on what the February summit on violent extremism will cover other than Islamic extremism.

“James von Brunn is somebody who in 2009, June of 2009, less than a mile from where we stand right now, went to the Holocaust Museum and shot a security guard in pursuit of some radical violent ideology,” Earnest told reporters at the daily briefing. “Back in 2012, an individual, Wade Michael Page, carried out an assault against a Sikh temple in Wisconsin. It’s unclear to me exactly what ideology motivated him. But that is a pretty good example of somebody who has a violent extreme ideology and an ideology and extremist practices that are worth countering.”

“Let me just give you one other example that’s actually close to my heart. There’s an individual who shot up the Jewish Community Center in suburban Kansas City, that this is an individual who, again, subscribes to a warped ideology that he tried to use to justify this violent attack. And you know, those are a couple of examples on the kinds of — the kind of violent extremism that our summit is motivated to counter.”

He said the purpose of the summit will be “to work with state and local officials to talk about best practices, about some of things that they can do in their community, to make sure that individuals like this don’t succeed in carrying out these acts of violence in the name of a warped ideology.”

Earnest added that President Obama’s administration “has expended significant resources, energy and time to counter violent extremists who carry out acts of terror, based on their own warped view of Islam.”

“…The reason I described it as a warped view of Islam is because these kinds of attacks have been roundly condemned in very forceful terms by Muslim leaders across the country. What we’ve also seen is that al-Qaeda and its adherence and its affiliates have carried out terror acts all across the globe. And the majority of the victims of those attacks have been Muslims.”

He also referred to terrorists as “violent extremists who have sought to incite a religious war against Islam.”

The White House has declined to use the terminology employed by French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, who said Saturday, “It is a war against terrorism and radical Islam, against everything aimed at breaking solidarity, liberty and fraternity.”

“It does seem clear that these terrorists, let’s call them what they are, these terrorists are individuals who would like to cloak themselves in the veil of a particular religion,” Earnest explained.

“But based on the fact that the religious leaders of that religion have roundly condemned their actions, those religious leaders have indicated that their actions are entirely inconsistent with Islam,” he said, stressing again that the number of Muslim victims in terror attacks “is a pretty clear indication that this is not a matter of the world being at war with Islam.”

“The world and the United States, as we’ve discussed before in the context of ISIL, is at war with these individuals, these violent extremists who carry out these acts of terror and try to justify it by invoking this religion.”

So, Earnest concluded, the terrorists are not radical Islamists.

“We want to describe exactly what happened. These are individuals who carried out an act of terrorism and they later tried to justify that act of terrorism by invoking the religion of Islam and their own deviant view of it,” he said.

“The second is this is an act that was roundly condemned by Muslim leaders. Again, I’m describing to you the reasons why we have not chosen to use that label, because it doesn’t seem to accurately describe what had happened. But we also don’t want to be in a situation where we are legitimizing what we consider to be a completely illegitimate justification for this violence, this act of terrorism. Again, I’m not going to criticize anybody who chooses to use that label. That I’m talking about the way that we’re talking about this. And what we’re trying to do is be as specific and as accurate as possible in describing what exactly occurred.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: france; islam; joshearnest; obamaislam; radicalislam; terrorism; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Iron Munro

Spot on


21 posted on 01/14/2015 8:22:04 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chuckster
Only a community organizing jackass could come up with the term violent extremist to cover for radical islam. The cartoonists in Paris weren't slaughtered in the name of violent extremist, they were slaughtered in the name of islam. We have a bunch of asshole cowards running our country.
22 posted on 01/14/2015 8:25:13 AM PST by peeps36 (Save The Tortoise And Kill The People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Our enemy (by its own declarations, bombings, Koran, and teachings) is ISLAM. Not ‘radical Islam’

To WH Spokesman Josh Earnest: Read their da&med Koran, or ask your boss — he can recite it from memory!

(ps: your name is a joke, right? Sort of like Mary Chastity working at a brothel?)


23 posted on 01/14/2015 8:31:40 AM PST by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
When will there be an open & honest discussion of exactly what is taught as acceptable muslim behavior in the koran?

Libs want to point out the peaceful passages but ignore the violent & intolerance passages.

24 posted on 01/14/2015 8:39:42 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Radical Islam is a cop out.

Like calling the SS Radical NAZIs.

Every poll that asks Muslims if they support terrorist acts against non-Muslims gets the same answer; the vast majority do.


25 posted on 01/14/2015 8:42:46 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The only reason “profiling” is being banned as a tool in crime fighting, is because the profile that always emerges as the most likely culprit of violent crime, is a black or brown or Islamic male.

And in our current death spiral PC culture...it is not nice to judge black and brown third world economically dis-advantaged people by the same standard that you would judge...oh let's say, Old White Guys.

Old White Guys, and white people in general, are judged by a standard that assumes that you are rich and privileged and that you got that way by unfairly taking stuff from the economically dis-advataged peoples of color.

26 posted on 01/14/2015 8:48:32 AM PST by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

White House has declined to use the terminology
It willn’t. Shan’t by decree no doubt.


27 posted on 01/14/2015 8:56:10 AM PST by Recompennation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
So, Earnest concluded, the terrorists are not radical Islamists.

1. They are terrorists.

2. They themselves say this is a Muslim Jihad.

Therefor they are Radical Islamist Terrorists and Josh Earnest is a paid liar.

28 posted on 01/14/2015 9:02:31 AM PST by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Shut up Josh!

We already know the answer.

vaudine

29 posted on 01/14/2015 9:12:32 AM PST by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“it doesn’t seem to accurately describe what had happened.”

At what point in time does it? How many more people have to be killed by Islamic Jihadists before you can be comfortable with calling them Islamic terrorists?


30 posted on 01/14/2015 9:21:48 AM PST by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Josh Earnest is a Ken doll.


31 posted on 01/14/2015 10:06:15 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Mark Levin calls him Josh NOTEarnest


32 posted on 01/14/2015 10:10:29 AM PST by SeekAndFind (If at first you don't succeed, put it out for beta test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It was the small hours of the morning and Josh Earnest was tossing and turning in bed. Graduation from Rice University was months ago and he had no job and a lot of SallieMae loans. Debt collectors were calling `early and often’. His old car was about to be re-possessed. His girl had left him.

Suddenly ..... Satan appeared at the foot of his bed! (Rumbling, stinking sulfur & brimstone smell)

“What do you want?” Josh squeals.

“YOU, Josh. I want you. I’m ready to give you fame, fortune and travel. And more.” said Beelzebub. “But you will have to lie like a bear rug. By that, I mean the truth and you must be complete strangers.”

Josh replied, “Hey, I majored in political science! And I’m a Democrat. I worked for president Obama’s campaign. No prob, Bob!”

“Cool.” said Satan.

“Wait a cotton-pickin’ second,” asked Josh. “What are you going to want from me in return?”

“That’s easy. I’ll want your immortal soul. I plan to roast you on a spit over hot flames forever.” replied the Prince of Darkness

Josh chewed this over, and said, “OK, lemme see if I understand. In exchange for my soul you offer big bucks, benefits and health care?”

“That’s right, and gold-plated health insurance, like all my other minions. None of that Affordable Care bronze crap.” replied the Devil

Josh “And sharp clothes, a nice car, hot chicks?”

Satan: “Yep. For as long as you live.”

Josh: “Mmmmm, golly. Gee, I dunno. There’s gotta be a catch ....”.


33 posted on 01/14/2015 11:04:44 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson