Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OPEC vs. U.S.: Who will blink first on oil?
CNN Money ^ | January 13, 2015 | Travis Hoium

Posted on 01/13/2015 8:21:17 PM PST by shepardspie33

The Merriam-Webster dictionary offers this definition for the word capitulate: "to stop fighting an enemy or opponent; to admit that an enemy or opponent has won."

I'm not sure who oil companies are fighting, whether it's oil traders, OPEC, Russia, or some invisible market force, but they're losing. The domestic standard, West Texas Intermediate crude oil, fell below $45 per barrel on Tuesday, while the global standard, Brent crude oil, is now well under $50.

Who is going to stop the bleeding? OPEC is not cutting production, the U.S. is expected to increase output in 2015, and Russia has little choice but to sell whatever crude oil it can just to make money. But someone will have to capitulate if these players aim to halt the slide in oil prices. Energy companies are nervous about a cutback in spending, but so far rigs are still finding work drilling for oil. Who is going to blink first? Depending on whom you ask, oil markets are oversupplied by 1 million to 2 million barrels per day. That creates a problem with oil prices because supply and demand are very inelastic, meaning they don't change very much even if prices change dramatically. Think about your own gasoline usage. If prices fall 50% how much more do you drive? Probably not very much.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; fracking; oil; opec
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: gaijin

Yeah, they probably don’t mind screwing Russia, Iran and the USA.
..................
However, as oil prices fall there will be less money available to send to radical madrases around the planet.


21 posted on 01/13/2015 10:34:11 PM PST by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
true. but that’s not a surprise I would bet on. The libyans are presently in the midst of civil war and they are producing at nearly 100% of capacity. currently the saudis are about the lowest cost producer on the planet.

It is a long shot, but consider that:

-Saudi Arabia doesn't have a lot of friends in the region. Their big buddy, the US, has left.

-They are a Sunni country, but with a large Shiite minority, and that minority is where the oil is, close to Iran.

- ISIS doesn't like them, and will try to destabilize the monarchy.

- Even within Saudi Arabia, the royal family is losing legitimacy.

22 posted on 01/13/2015 10:44:47 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

There’s just not enough smoke around in Saudi Arabia to suggest the fire you’re talking about. The gulf states are just too economically dynamic right now to be in any real trouble.

But if oil prices stay down for a couple years. Maybe things will change. But first the Saudis have to burn through about 800 billion dollars in reserves.

After that, anything can happen.


23 posted on 01/13/2015 11:31:20 PM PST by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33

Obama.


24 posted on 01/13/2015 11:36:45 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33

BS...there is no “US”...the oil industry is so diverse and spread over areas of production it cannot be controlled. Free enterprise is the reason oil is falling in price...low demand and high supplies. The Saudis and others can no longer control prices...and sure cant control demand!

If we want stability..we have to be the big supplier. Wont happen till we get a new pres.


25 posted on 01/14/2015 1:49:30 AM PST by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33; All

Very interesting. Thanks to all posters.


26 posted on 01/14/2015 2:40:04 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

very good post. Oil has been an oligarchy for a while. A few controlled production and by that controlled price. Eventually oligarchies break down in a large market. The big sticking point of shale oil was infrastructure, and after that got built because of artificially high prices, the oligarchy broke down.

Free markets don’t blink. Economics will determine price.

DK


27 posted on 01/14/2015 3:23:42 AM PST by Dark Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: familyop
The companies with the highest costs and most debt in OPEC and the U.S. will shut down, while those with lower costs and less debt will continue.

IOW, the U.S.
As I understand, when the price drops below $60/bl, the US companies can't make money.

My granddaughter in heavily involved with the Bakken oilfield so I'm watching developments closely.

28 posted on 01/14/2015 4:11:11 AM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33
The economic damage to the West is negligible compared to the foreign policy gains accomplished by bankrupting the Russian Bear (read Belarus, North Korea, Iran-Syria nexus, Venezuela & even Cuba).

The geopolitical shift in alliances and toppling of certain dictators may well justify this phase of American Might being exercised via the old Military-Political-Economic trinity of Cold War vintage.

Ah, the smell of regime change is as sweet as Napalm in the morning!

29 posted on 01/14/2015 6:05:08 AM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33
What these media idiots always fail to realize is that, in the long run, the price of oil (or anything else for that matter) is established by the law of supply and demand. Countries and cartels can tinker with the supply, but they have virtually nothing to say about the demand. Demand is influenced by needs, price, and desires. At low price, the demand goes up, and at high price, the demand goes down.

Horizontal drilling and fracking have greatly altered the supply equation. Few suppliers will sell oil for long if it costs more to extract it than they get for selling it. Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Venezuela and others have low extraction costs, but only when you consider the direct costs. They also have extremely high costs associated with the fact they run their country off the revenue generated by oil sale. When you factor this in, their production costs are likely to be even higher than the costs associated with fracking and horizontal drilling. It remains to be seen whether or not the frackers will beat the socialists. I'll place my bets on the frackers.

30 posted on 01/14/2015 6:33:01 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33
the U.S. is expected to increase output in 2015

What a typically stupid article.

The "U.S." doesn't determine oil output. Hundreds of individual companies determine their own production. Now, maybe Saudi Arabia might blink, but American decisions will be based on the profitability of continued production.

Nothing else.

31 posted on 01/14/2015 10:28:46 AM PST by BfloGuy ( Even the opponents of Socialism are dominated by socialist ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

Hi, Vinny. Some of the bigger outfits in the Bakken will survive oil prices lower than that, but some of the smaller ones, not as easily. WTI crude is going back up now, for the time being ($48.49 a barrel after a quick look at the time of this comment).


32 posted on 01/14/2015 1:50:25 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
first the Saudis have to burn through about 800 billion dollars in reserves.
. . . and just where is that money invested - and what will happen if it is withdrawn???

33 posted on 01/14/2015 2:23:47 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Iran can sell it and let someone else refine it.....like maybe the chicoms.
Oil does seem to have settled now though, maybe the Frackers are brokering the Saudi/Isis vs Iran/Chicom problem?


34 posted on 01/14/2015 3:47:22 PM PST by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: shepardspie33
I'm not sure who oil companies are fighting, whether it's oil traders, OPEC, Russia, or some invisible market force, but they're losing...

Statements such as this illustrate why what 'experts' say should be viewed cynically if at all.

35 posted on 01/15/2015 7:36:06 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
That would mean S.A.’s market share would climb, permitting them to make more money...

Except SA is producing at virtually full capacity.

36 posted on 01/15/2015 7:37:53 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
With lowered prices, business will start picking up and demand will increase and prices will eventually rise again. It’s inevitable. It will all come back into a natural balance again...

Not the first time, and not the last time this has happened.

SA is the swing producer. When OPEC says let's cut production, OPEC means SA. SA has measured the market and judged they would take too large a hit production wise to bring the market back.

SA does this occasionally to help the rest of OPEC "get their head on straight." Countries like Venezuela and Iran have to bleed for awhile until they are willing to exhibit market discipline. SA could take a 2-3 MBD cut in production, or OPEC as a whole could take a 10% cut in production.

Of course, this time is fundamentally different because of fracking. OPEC will continue to lose market share at $100/bbl oil because of increased non-OPEC production.

It's no win for SA.

37 posted on 01/15/2015 7:53:12 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Increasing market share in a declining market may not be a viable strategy if making more money were the goal. I don't think it is. I think there are political forces at work here more than economic ones...

Margin X volume=profit

38 posted on 01/15/2015 7:54:22 AM PST by gogeo (If you are Tea Party, the eGOP does not want you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
Margin X volume=profit

This assumes Margins is constant. Usually, margins are compressed when prices are falling.

39 posted on 01/15/2015 8:02:45 AM PST by econjack (I'm not bossy...I just know what you should be doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

Profit = sales - expense

sales is a function of volume


40 posted on 01/15/2015 8:10:08 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson