Posted on 01/09/2015 4:07:09 PM PST by presidio9
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney , the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, told a meeting of donors Friday that he is considering another White House bid in 2016, people present said.
The possibility of a third Romney bid could upend the emerging GOP field, coming as top Republican donors are starting to rally behind former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush.
Mr. Romney made the remarks during a session Friday afternoon -SNIP-
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
To quote the late Jackie Gleason from Smokey and the Bandit... You can think about it, but don’t do it.
There are 5 of us here now. Including the big cat. Don’t think more are needed really.
One yet lives.
The actual question as you keep attacking Reagan with for example, "But I'd have a hard time getting past his pro-abortion vote, and I know I'm alone in that sentiment."
Was;
"What is strange, is that the "Therapeutic Abortion Act", bill was signed during his first 4 months in office, in 1967, but you keep thinking that we didn't know that when supporting him the rest of his career, look at your own statement, how could you be voting for the man and supporting him and not know that?"
Banned by JimRob on this thread on 1-19-2012:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2834897/replies?c=180
For posting the same type nonsense she’s posting now.
JimRob’s banning at reply #186.
Begged her way back 7 months later.
Cruz/Nugent 2016 They would do what has to be done about our raghead problem.
Even if Christie, Bush and Romney all run - the GOPe still has losers Santorum and Huckabee ready to siphon off some early primary votes from a more viable conservative candidate.
I think the two people that you're looking for have left this thread. I can't imagine that there were very many people on this website who were more vocally opposed to Romney than I was in 2012.
Here's my only point. I agree the logic that leads people to stay home and not vote when we inevitably nominate someone like Romney. Personally, I wouldn't go that far, but I can empathize.
My observations are concerned with the primaries. Before I worry about who the absolute best, most conservative candidate is in the field, my first priority is to ensure we don't get stuck with a choice between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush or Mitt Romeny.
Baloney. I know for a fact that's it's illegal, per FR rules, to read the thread OR the article before posting!
And here they are doing it again.
They got banned for the Romneybot BS before. And they are doing it again.
If the definition of insanity is...
This is the definition of stupidity.
Put a cowboy hat on Perry and he wins hands down.
:) Irish
Not when it’s your job. By her own admission she was GOP employed. Seems to me that she still is.
More than likely.
But I've got a sick feeling that we'll have Trump in the party..
First, I have never attacked Ronald Reagan. In fact, I just got finished saying that he was the second greatest president in this nation's history.
Second, you are not making much sense in the rest of your post. What we did in 1980 is irrelevant. I'm very worried about you if you don't understand this.
This is what I was talking about when I warned you yesterday about wasting your life and hurting yourself.
Repeating the same crap over and over again hoping for a different outcome.
Duh!
It does certainly seem to be, doesn't it?
All more GOP means is more options for moral cowards to run to before a conservative because of ‘party unity’.
And pushing multiloser Romney repeatedly even after a banning for same is the definition of stupid.
Needs to be in the FR dictionary.
I was never convinced that Romney would have been any better than Obama. Just one look at his record in office confirms that he's just as much a liberal.
Some say, 'at least he's not a radical Marxist', but given the damage he did in Massachusetts, I'm again, unconvinced. The guy is a poser and a complete liar. He could be anything - except a conservative Republican.
One thing is sure. If he'd been elected, a Republican dominated Congress would have rubber stamped every bit of his liberal agenda without question. At least under Obama, they've tried to fight back. This, despite their abysmal 'leadership'.
Again, why shouldn’t she. She does it, continues doing it and is still here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.