LOL. Half the Liberals in America, along with a good chunk of the media, suggested that the cartoonists had it coming for “provoking” the Islamists and yet the Washington Post finds a way to spin it into an attack on Catholics. I read what Bill Donohue wrote. It was ill timed and not the right response to what happened, but it is not nearly as bad as the statements of some others in the media who reflexively blamed the satirists.
Bill Donohue doesn’t speak for Catholics. Bill Donohue speaks for Bill Donohue.
Hey, Bill. Our immemorial religion considers the teachings of Mohammed to be a false religion, regardless of anything that may be contained in the Vatican II documents. Popes Leo XIII and Pius XI have called it a “darkness”.
Why don’t you stop commenting on things you clearly know nothing about.
So Jesus provoked His crucifixion?
Bill Donohue, following the lead of Il Papa.
“Ya see what ya made me do?”
Blame the victims.
It’s a wonder he didn’t blame the guns.................
“They have also shown Muhammad in pornographic poses.”
They did the same with nuns and the Pope, but I didn’t see any Catholics showing up with AK-47s to shoot up the place.
So, the causal factor is NOT what was published.
I’m not sure it fits exactly, but I just read a quote from a missionary killed in Africa as he exercised his speech to spread the Christian gospel: “He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.”
Kinda like that altar boy provoked that priest by wearing shorts.
Both things are true. That the Muslims as a group keep breeding violent criminals is true, but that anti-Christian and anti-Muslim Left do not deserve a free speech protection for their cartoons is also true.
1) Murder is wrong. The mad mohammedans who murdered, in cold blood, the cartoonists at "Charlie Hebdo" need to hang by the neck until they are dead.
2) Prior to this islamic terrorist atrocity, I had never heard of "Charlie Hebdo". By murdering these cartoonists in cold blood, the vile demon-inspired subhuman cockroaches gave the cartoonists a much wider audience than they ever had before. They turned the cartoonists into secular "martyrs". The islamic filth are stupid as well as evil.
3) The output of "Charlie Hebdo" was and is, IMO, repulsive and reprehensible; the product of diseased minds. It deserved either to be ignored as unworthy of comment, or to be opposed in the realm of ideas. Proverbs 26:4-5. It should NOT, IMO, be unreservedly praised. Je ne suis pas 'Charlie'.
By this logic, I guess a woman walking alone at night is “asking for it,” too.
"Killing in response to insult, no matter how gross, must be unequivocally condemned. That is why what happened in Paris cannot be tolerated," said Donohue...
Charlie Heb did cartoons o the Pope half naked and wearing a condom, nuns masturbating with crucifixes, and Our Lord doing things I can't describe. I would be RIGHT to be angry, but not JUSTIFIED in going out and murdering people.
But notice how the Wawa Compost frames it. It says that many have rallied in support of the magazine and its right to free speech...
"But not everyone is so supportive. Bill Donohue...
Bill Donohue has been consistently in favor of free speech and free press, and consistently against obscene provocations (without calling for prior censorship or state suppression of offensive speech.)
But the WaWa Compost has finally put two conservatives into the ring, so to speak, and is now urging, "Let's you an' him fight!"
They just aim to set conservatives to punching each other our.
Amazing how easily they succeed.
And what religion was it that has a nasty habit of allowing their priest’s molest little boys??
If these people think the cartoonists deserve it, then what do they think of the millions on the Internet that post far more insulting and degrading things about islam??
Selective outrage seems to be another Islamic trait...also the trait of idiots I must add.
I guess all those scantly clad females are provoking me and other men as well.