Posted on 01/07/2015 1:59:41 PM PST by Jim Robinson
During the January 7 terror attack on the Charlie Hebdo headquarters, several Paris police officers fled, unable to disarm the threat, because they themselves were unarmed and outgunned.
Breitbart News previously reported that “black-hooded-men” with Kalashnikovs entered the Charlie Hedbo headquarters and opened fire, killing 12 people–including those who were killed outside the building as the gunmen headed back to their car.
CBS News relayed reports from Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that the first two officers to arrive “were apparently unarmed” and “fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher.”
The UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman who had been assigned the position of bodyguard to Charlie Hebdo editor, Stephane Charbonnier, was killed, and one policeman on a mountain bike was killed, as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
It is also important to point out that the unarmed police, who were unable to return fire, allowed the terrorists to escape because they could not pin them down or disable their vehicle.
They should be embarrassed, but they won’t be...
there are many leftists on record supporting various issues that led to this massacre.
Like Obama stating that the future must not belong to those who slander Mad Mo.
His spokesman trying to have it both ways about freedom of expression vs publishing “insulting” cartoons.
Some leftist extolling the virtues of unarmed police...
>>>Enablers are every bit as guilty as the perps themselves
Look upstream, mohammad & his Koran in partnership with allah!
It’s good that France banned guns so mass shootings would never happen there. :)
Police In Name Only
I agree with her fear of Muslims in France, but Europe’s press at least calls a spade a spade.
I don’t worry about these attacks on American journalists because they are collaborators with the Muslims.
Good thing they didn’t have guns.
They might have been able to defend themselves against terrorists!!
/liberal logic
the French have a machine that cuts off heads—Time to dust it off.
I bet they won’t be ‘unarmed’ from now on............................
If DeBlasio had his way, this would be NYPD cops.
Consider Obama statement, “The future must not belong to those who slander Islam”
This is the same as saying those who slander Islam should die.
Tomorrow is the future. To say, “Tomorrow must not belong to those who slander Islam”, is the same as saying they should die today.
The person filming could have thrown flower pots down at the mohammedans.
They need to make sure all the signs declaring an area as a gun free zone are in both French and Arabic.
http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/last-public-execution-guillotine-france-1939/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypq3CqU0384
12 died that may not have had French police been armed.
Of course muslims burning cars on New Years in France was 940 cars torched this year.
Maybe if police were armed it would cut down on loss of life and property, ya think?
Who knew?!?!
That also suggest showing proper respect for an armed officer.
Or, that they should be reduced to being uninfluential... but he does not understand that one religion’s praise is another religion’s slander. This is the same unbalanced, one sided thought that liberals give to most things.
The Ferguson protestors should love these terrorists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.