Posted on 01/07/2015 1:59:41 PM PST by Jim Robinson
During the January 7 terror attack on the Charlie Hebdo headquarters, several Paris police officers fled, unable to disarm the threat, because they themselves were unarmed and outgunned.
Breitbart News previously reported that “black-hooded-men” with Kalashnikovs entered the Charlie Hedbo headquarters and opened fire, killing 12 people–including those who were killed outside the building as the gunmen headed back to their car.
CBS News relayed reports from Britain’s Telegraph newspaper that the first two officers to arrive “were apparently unarmed” and “fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher.”
The UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman who had been assigned the position of bodyguard to Charlie Hebdo editor, Stephane Charbonnier, was killed, and one policeman on a mountain bike was killed, as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Wrong. And then some.
Bet it will be 100% from now on..........................
Sharia was this terror attack and terror is going to be Shariah in London. These were islamic religious police enforcement, just like when the French Cardinal used his own agents to murder the Duke of Buckingham.
Thanks. Looks like the municipal police are under the mayor’s jurisdiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcement_in_France
So what is my point?? Arm up, protect and Defend. No more run and hide, scream and shout.
Take the fight to the terrorists, outlaw Islam.
This massacre is a perfect example off how the freedom of speech is worthless without a concurrent right to keep and bear arms.
The victims in this case should have been armed to the teeth. Instead they were sitting ducks.
If a major city doesn’t arm their police they are fools. This is really true if you have a large Muslim population or the city is a tourist city.
If a major city doesn’t arm their police they are fools. This is really true if you have a large Muslim population or the city is a tourist city.
Shot from the back in cold blood.....wonder whether the French are as thick as the fascists we have in the White Hut.......I tend to think that the French blood runs a tad hotter....we will have to see.
ISIS wants to provoke a unified Western attack in their territory very badly....from a smoldering war to outright blood bath.Its all a part of their game plan....... they want the whole world to see how weak and unprepared the West is to admit and prosecute a “religious war” against Islam itself, which is actually the only answer.Let the “good” Muslims act to choose the side of liberty and freedom, and there will be few enough of those when the counting is done.
This is the purpose of the attacks in the West.ISIS want their bait to be taken to further divide the Ummah beween the quick and the dead.It remains to be seen whether they get what they want, but not likely from Obama.
Obama lost the war of “anti-jihad” he so reluctantly prosecuted into a political correctness endeavor.It will be left to others who succeed him to awaken and carry the battle of the two “civilizations” which must come, or it will be left to his European contemporaries.It is actually inevitable even to the point of nuclear war.
But it is as you say, we should watching the salafists destroy themselves for as long as possible, but now Europe is sorely tested.I have to laugh at all the hippies who protest as if what they do matters, very few of them who are willing to pick up a gun, while thousands of Islamic Europeans each have one in their closets, along with a few cases of ammo.
Their MO has always been to provoke and provoke some more until the victim has no recourse but to retaliate, where-upon they claim they are being supressed, and that’s when the slaughter takes place. You can see it in operation in Israel, they blew up buses full of civilians, and more recently, aimed thousands of rockets across the border - and when Israel does what it must, they claim victimhood, with the help of the lying Press.
Any excuse will do. Right now, I’m suspicious that the feeble attack on a mosque in Paris is a self-inflicted injury.
If we don’t take part, they create their own ‘cycle of violence’ - there’ll be a blood-bath if the various governments don’t wake up.
I’m not prepared to lie down and die for the sake of ‘peace’ which means the imams are winning. I want them out of the country. I want the clerics rounded up, and no returning fighters from ISIS allowed freedom of movement.
The gate should be shut against them, be they citizens or not.
The gate should be shut against them, be they citizens or not.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thats the way it is for “returning ISIS participants” in Canada and Australia.
But in the USA we have people returning from Syria who have been fighting with one side or the other, as a matter of a right of citizenship.
We have both pro ISIS and Pro Iraq/Kurds who go over to fight. They come back , bringing the possibility of importing both sides of the war to America.....so I expect that it will not be too long before that imported fight is waged in the USA.Obama has things configured for social instability, no matter which way you cut it.
We also have a few in the country who were allowed back in before the SHTF. Our government says they are ‘keeping our eye on them’
Not good enough. It only takes one. We are all expecting something. Let’s face it, people have to die in large numbers before there are any meaningful changes. Right now, the TV scumbags are interviewing muslim ‘spokes-people’ who are ‘condemning’ the atrocity in France.
We only ever learn the hard way. The government is concentrating on preventing the would-be jihadi killers from leaving and joining ISIS.
They should be encouraging them to leave and not allow them back.
AND AS I WAS SAYING:
As French police hunt a pair of returned jihadists following a Paris massacre, Tony Abbott has said Australia cannot keep constant tabs on all extremists returning to its shores.
The challenge for Western governments is not finding dangerous extremists, but keeping them under constant surveillance, experts have said in the wake of the shocking Charlie Hebdo massacre in which two gunmen evaded French police and are now on the run.
Very terse, and worthless admonishment.
Please elucidate.
As explained, the French police (95%) are armed, only some aren’t and sadly the policeman wasn’t. Generally also, the French police are more para-military in getup and style and frankly tougher than the average UK police.
You were right - I was wrong and I prefer to be set right than to fester in ignorance. Thanks
My apologies for the earlier post, I was too sharp with you.
Accepted and thanks...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.