Posted on 12/20/2014 7:37:08 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
With the recent defeat of Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu — which leaves three Democratic Southern U.S. Senators — the common wisdom is that Democrats should bid farewell to the South.
Even with favorable changing national demographics that benefit Democrats, an abandonment of the South and, on a larger scale, a viable moderate wing would be a mistake.
Recently, writer Michael Tomasky argued that the South, a “reactionary, prejudice-infested” region, should be left to Republicans to create a “free market Jesus paradise.” Few sentiments better show what is wrong with Democrats today and why ironic Republican arguments that it is the Democrats who are the “elitists” gain traction.
Democrats still need both the South and a viable national moderate wing. The South is where successful Democratic presidential candidates — who are moderate enough to win nationally — call home. For the 11 presidential elections before 2008, all successful Democratic candidates were Southerners, and three of the last four nominated vice presidential Democratic candidates were Southerners. Centrist Southern Democrats champion today the values of the New Deal and the “Beloved Community” while keeping faith with local values.
A Democratic Southern abandonment would only further leave our two major political parties without viable moderate wings. Southern states that once produced productive moderate Democrats — who did not ridicule their constituents as “reactionary, prejudiced-infested” rednecks and fought for racial and social justice — cannot be abandoned to produce another Ted Cruz.
Contrary to popular wisdom, Democrats can still win in the South. The key to this is to connect with voters, not to embrace elitist notions that reject voters through crude cultural and religious stereotypes.
Democrats often blame this failure in the South on racism and redistricting. The great dividends for Republicans from their post-civil rights era Southern strategy realignment — now condemned conveniently by some Republicans after its benefits have been exhausted — are undeniable. Equally undeniable is the detrimental impact of racial redistricting, where Republican legislators pack minorities into Democratic majority districts and whitewash their own districts.
However, the Democratic tone has changed, too, to the detriment of moderate Southern Democrats. Though Democrats remarkably claim that Ronald Reagan could not survive a Republican primary today, the reverse question must be posed: Would a moderate Democrat survive a national primary today? Could a Lloyd Bentsen — the 1988 Democratic vice presidential nominee — survive today? Could a Democrat who, like Bill Clinton in 1992, challenged Democratic orthodoxy on welfare, balanced budgets and crime survive a primary?
In Florida, the farm system that once produced such Democrats as Reubin Askew, Bob Graham and Lawton Chiles is defunct thanks not only to Republican redistricting but also Democratic malfeasance. Furthermore, a national trend of Democrats stressing liberal positions on social issues has harmed all moderate candidates, especially in the South. The national Democratic Party commits itself to liberal positions on gay marriage, abortion rights and gun control, with limited room for local accommodation.
The answer to the 2014 election loss is not for Democrats to become more regionally and ideologically isolated, or to attack Southern voters. Although Democrats will always be a majority progressive party, Democrats must have a viable moderate wing in a big tent, and nowhere is that moderate wing more needed than in the South.
The region where a weakened Franklin Roosevelt came to find rehabilitation and inspiration in Warm Springs, Georgia, can still today provide rehabilitation and inspiration for Democrats nationally.
*******
Luis E. Viera is a Tampa attorney.
“To crush your enemies — See them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women!”
Bwaaaaahaaaahhhhaaaaaa!!!!
They’re figuring out to lie better not to move to the center.
Conservative Southern Democrats are as extinct as the dodo and they won’t be coming back.
Luis, poor poor Luis....the Democrats radical liberal agenda is what “wrote off” the South. To get the south back, or even become competitive again, they’d have to write off their radical left wing OWS Liz Warren Al Sharpton base.....and they’re not gonna do that.
Come to think of it — who was the last ‘conservative’ RAT?
Yup. Zell Miller has no chance in what the Democratic Party has become today.
He would have to run as a Republican with his kind of views.
Oh.....they’re not .....just waiting for a sufficient number of wetbacks to change the southern voting dynamic.
Zel Miller was the last I had any respect for.
They’re not interested in being moderate - the Democrats would rather be left and dead than compromise and win.
In TX, they’ll be waiting a long time... the GOP racked up 44% of the Hispanic vote in November.
Playing the oppressed migra card is past the sell date now that Obama effectively took it off the table.
What have they got left?
SOUNDS LIKE A PLAN.
I have never understood this. Anybody that knows southerners know they love freedom while despising heavy handed government. How then, such socialists as Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton? People like them do not represent the real south.
...which is why Zell delivered keynote to the GOP Convention in 2004, endorsing Bush over Kerry - and famously asking Chrissie Matthews “what do you want us to do, throw spitballs...”
Carter and Clinton fooled the electorate, largely with their accents and a press that refused to out them as hard core lefties.
Their base hates Christians, white males, traditional families, any one with real jobs, hunters and gun owners and military service people.
Apart from blacks and gentrified white liberals, its hard to see how the party will become politically viable again.
Soooo if millions of illegals enter the voting rolls....then you have, with those numbers a 56% Dhimmicrat majority.
I liked Clinton’s Third Way platform and that’s why I voted for him the first time around. It was a refreshing break from liberal orthodoxy.
Nothing like the centrist Democratic Leadership Council exists in the party today.
but you miss a couple of things: you are assuming “millions” more into Texas, and that’s not reasonable. You are also assuming this invasion wouldn’t drive more whites, more blacks (post Obama) and more existing Hispanics away from the Dem Party - and it certainly would.
The real demographic problem in this country is not Republicans with Hispanics and women, it’s the Democrats with whites in general, and certainly married whites.
That assumes Latinos are racist voters like blacks.
There’s no evidence of it.
Wow, that takes guts to admit that. Really? That flapdoodle fooled you? Don't know if I'd be mentioning that on open forum too much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.