Skip to comments.
State Lawmakers Nationwide Look to Shift Power Away from D.C.
sunshine state news ^
| December 11, 2014
| KATHRYN WATSON WATCHDOG.ORG
Posted on 12/11/2014 6:14:51 AM PST by dontreadthis
A movement is afoot from state lawmakers who believe the federal government has amassed far too much power, to the detriment of state authority and autonomy.
Theyre embarking on a massive undertaking -- crafting a set of guidelines for considering amendments to the U.S. Constitution in order to shift more power back to the states.
Just blocks from the White House, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., state lawmakers representing different political stripes and 28 states from Alaska to Florida this week brainstormed suggestions for going about an Article V convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Their specific causes are many, ranging from campaign finance reform after the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, to EPA regulation overreach, to the need for a balanced federal budget amendment. Those differences will need refining eventually. Still, lawmakers rallied around one thing at a gathering of the Assembly of State Legislatures in Washington, D.C. -- the need to reign in Washington.
I want to make sure that my grandchildren have a vibrant Constitution that protects their freedom, said Scott Lingamfelter, a Republican delegate from Virginia who is pushing a resolution for a convention in that state.
(Excerpt) Read more at sunshinestatenews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: articlev
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Article V ping!
To: dontreadthis
2
posted on
12/11/2014 6:15:54 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: dontreadthis
Then you better learn to be a little more self sufficient. Fed workers in the state...get rid of them.
The destructive unions....get rid of them.
Daycare...get rid of it.
Head Start...get rid of it.
Board of Regents (NYS)....get rid of it.
EPA....get rid of it.
To: dontreadthis; Publius; Jacquerie
4
posted on
12/11/2014 6:24:57 AM PST
by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: dontreadthis; All
Art. V & 10th. Adm't./repeal 16th. & 17th. Adm't BUMP!
"crater" the IR$ & N$A..limit fed. outlays to 15% GDP..15% flat tax or 18% sales (no deductions)
5
posted on
12/11/2014 6:26:14 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
("Bathhouse" E'Bola/0'Boehmer/0'McConnell; all STINK and their best friends are flies. d8^)
To: dontreadthis
All that is needed is to Repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments
6
posted on
12/11/2014 6:36:23 AM PST
by
eyeamok
To: dontreadthis
They’ll have a fight on their hands. People don’t give up power easily. The corrupt do not give up power at all. And Washington is the greatest concentration of power and corruption in history.
7
posted on
12/11/2014 6:37:48 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Hubris and denial overwhelm Western Civilization. Nemesis and tragedy always follow.)
To: yldstrk
“Theyre embarking on a massive undertaking — crafting a set of guidelines for considering amendments to the U.S. Constitution in order to shift more power back to the states”
Just invoke the 10th amendment and save themselves the aggravation of trying to pass new ammendments.
8
posted on
12/11/2014 7:13:05 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Crazieman; Resolute Conservative; VerySadAmerican; Nuc 1.1; MamaTexan; Political Junkie Too; ...
Article V ping!
I just got off the phone with the Laura Ingraham show, where I made a quick case for Article V and re-federalization of Washington. She was very receptive.
(self pat on back)
9
posted on
12/11/2014 7:21:34 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
To: Georgia Girl 2
It isn't in the aggregate political interest of congressmen or senators to invoke the 10th. If it was, they would have been doing so these past 101 years.
Scotus has occasionally run interference for the states, but many judges regard that as judicial activism.
10
posted on
12/11/2014 7:25:08 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
To: Jacquerie
I could be mistaken...often am, but is it not up to the votes from our congressional elect to force an article V?
To: Jacquerie
Good on ya’.
Give yourself a pat for me.
12
posted on
12/11/2014 7:26:42 AM PST
by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: Jacquerie
13
posted on
12/11/2014 7:27:31 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Savage Beast
"Washington is the greatest concentration of power and corruption in history" That's the point - this bypasses Washington.
14
posted on
12/11/2014 7:32:40 AM PST
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: servantboy777
Pretty sure it only requires the state legislatures. You need two thirds of them to call a constitutional convention and three quarters of them to ratify new amendments.
15
posted on
12/11/2014 7:33:36 AM PST
by
VOR78
To: Jacquerie
"I just got off the phone with the Laura Ingraham show" Awesome!
16
posted on
12/11/2014 7:34:07 AM PST
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: Jacquerie
28th Amendment:
Section 1. The sixteenth and the seventeenth articles of amendment to the Constitution of the United States are hereby repealed.
17
posted on
12/11/2014 7:37:20 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: servantboy777
"is it not up to the votes from our congressional elect to force an article V?" Article V says Congress "shall call" a convention. It is not optional.
18
posted on
12/11/2014 7:37:35 AM PST
by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: servantboy777
Nope. The state convention half of Article V is almost entirely extra-congressional. Once thirty-four states have applied (34 have), congress is required to call a convention.
19
posted on
12/11/2014 7:39:57 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
To: central_va
Works for me. The 16th is without doubt the evil sibling of the wicked 17th.
20
posted on
12/11/2014 7:41:00 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson