Final Score: GOP Gains Nine Senate Seats, Will Hold 54-46 Majority

Townhall.com ^ | December 8, 2014 | Guy Benson

[Kaslin]

Saturday's Louisiana runoff election closed the book on the 2014 election cycle (with one small exception noted below); as the dust settles, the GOP achieved a net gain of nine Senate seats, and will command a healthy 54-46 majority in the upper chamber come January. Republicans controlled just 40 Senate seats as recently as early 2010.  A few notes on Bill Cassidy's lopsided defeat of Sen. Mary Landrieu, as well as the larger national picture, starting with a look at Cassidy's 56/44 victory margin:

All votes in. #LASen Cassidy 712,330 55.94% Landrieu 561,099 44.06%— AoSHQ Decision Desk (@AoSHQDD) December 7, 2014

A visualization of Landrieu's downfall, as compared to her last runoff Senate victory a dozen years ago.  Change:

Better comparison, perhaps: At left is Landrieu's last runoff win in 2002, by 3 points. At right is tonight's result pic.twitter.com/2JAv1ospLJ— David Freddoso (@freddoso) December 7, 2014

Landrieu's was a long-held Democratic seat. And I do mean long: 132 years, to be exact. It has now been won by a conservative Republican and medical doctor who's devoted much of his career to treating indigent patients for free.  Landrieu has voted 97 percent of the time in favor of the Obama agenda, a statistic confirmed on camera by her chief of staff.  Despite her family name, political heritage in the state, and general cockiness, Landrieu was defeated by double digits.  Cassidy's victory capped off a banner year for Senate Republicans.  Their net jump of nine seats is the largest by either party in any election since 1980, when the GOP netted 12 seats in the Reagan wave.  The party also shook an electoral monkey off its back:

Since '80, GOP hasn't knocked off more than 2 Sen Dem incumbents in any election cycle. Beat 5 this year. #LASen #NCSen #COSen #AKSen #ARSen— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) December 7, 2014

Obamacare -- which Landrieu supported and has since defended -- was a central issue in this campaign.  Now that she's been dispatched, fully half of the 60 Senate Democrats who cast votes for the law in late 2009 will be gone from the legislative body when the new Congress convenes next month, via Phil Klein:

On Dec. 24, 2009, the Democratic-controlled Senate passed President Obama’s healthcare law with a filibuster-proof 60-vote majority, triggering a massive backlash that propelled Republicans to control of the House the following year. On the Senate side, going into this year's midterm elections, 25 senators who voted for Obamacare were already out or not going be part of the new Senate being sworn in next month. After Democratic losses on Nov. 4 and Saturday's defeat of Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., the number has risen to 30. In other words, half of the Senators who voted for Obamacare will not be part of the new Senate.

To be sure, it isn’t fair to attribute all of the turnover in the chamber to Obamacare...That having been said, many senators who voted for Obamacare lost re-election battles in which they were hit hard for their support for the law and other Democrats were forced to retire because they had no hope of getting re-elected given their support for the law. A total of 16 Senators who voted for Obamacare either failed to win reelection or declined to run for reelection and had their seats turned over to Republicans.

Which is why some Democrats are finally admitting the obvious: Ramming through Obamacare was a critical and costly mistake.  The unpopular healthcare may be the single most potent factor in the utter decimation of Southern Democrats, who have been wiped out from the the Atlantic coast to Texas.  This statistic is delightful, not just because of Dems' goose egg but because the GOP's tally provides a powerful counterpoint to the Left's preferred "anti-Obama racial animus" explanation:

—> RT @nxthompson: Now official: in the Deep South, black Republicans (1) now outnumber white Democrats (0) in the Senate.— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) December 7, 2014

I'll leave you with two statistics from the House side: First, Republicans will now control at least 246 lower chamber seats next year, equaling the party's post-WWII high water mark.  If they hang on and win a recount in an Arizona race, they'll hit 247, their highest number since the late 1920's.  Taking last night's House runoff results into account, Barack Obama has presided over more midterm losses for his party than any other president in the last six decades.  "Make no mistake: these policies are on the ballot. Every single one of them," Obama famously said in October. Indeed. And voters responded accordingly.

[PROCON]

54-46

So we would need 12 'rats voting with the pubs to over-ride odumbo's vetoes, seems impossible..at least we have both Houses, one thing at a time..

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Jed Babbin has a great piece in the Spectator today. The GOP has already pissed away the majority.

[Mariner]

And they behave like they lost 9 seats.

[Charles Henrickson]

Obamacare -- which Landrieu supported and has since defended -- was a central issue in this campaign. Now that she's been dispatched, fully half of the 60 Senate Democrats who cast votes for the law in late 2009 will be gone. . . .

They don't, and they did.

[hal ogen]

Well...well. Now let’s see if the Repubs know how to wield their power. If they don’t...they will become the Whigs of the 21st century. No “power sharing” and no “reaching across the aisle to our friends”. The last two elections say that the American people are fed-up with the commie asshats in government. Don’t mis-read the message, Repubs.

[RonboTex]

Doesn’t matter. They are complicit with Obama & the Democrats on most issues. They won’t use the power of the purse to cut off funding for obamacare or amnesty. They are about to fund all of Obama’s illegal actions 100% before they even take over next year.

Pathetically tragic but sadly true.

[GreyFriar]

Yes, let’s attack the Republican’s while the Democrats still control the Senate for not doing what they can do after they have the actual majority in January.

[Mariner]

They don't need a majority to stop Obama.

That's disingenuous.

[CivilWarBrewing]

Let’s hope the party of ‘NO’ (to Marxism) remains the party of ‘NO’ (to Marxism).

[chris37]

Doesn’t matter at all.

Waste of time.

[tflabo]

Mary hasn’t been applying Mooschelles school lunch diet. No wonder the Bamster kept his distance— and Ma Mooch too.

[INVAR]

Well...well. Now let’s see if the Repubs know how to wield their power…No “power sharing” and no “reaching across the aisle to our friends”

You are a little late to what McConnell said he would do even BEFORE the election:

McConnell wants to hit the ground running in January — thinks Democrats are ready to join him in crafting a more open, functional Senate.

Look, we suffered a coup - and the GOP Ruling Class LIKES this Imperial Fascist Oligarchy being established over us.

[TomGuy]

If McConnell and Boehner fold to everything the Dems/Obama do, their majority hold may be short lived.

In 2016, the Pubbies will be defending 24 Senate seats, while the Dems defend 10 Senate seats. Half of those Pubbies are of the ‘moderate’ variety who have more friends across the aisle than on their side of the aisle.

[Kaslin]

Blah blah blah. Your negativity is disgusting

[DoughtyOne]

Final Score: GOP Gains Nine Senate Seats, Will Hold 54-46 Majority...

...and will still lose on most issues.

[Secret Agent Man]

You know if Obama really wanted to play hardball he’d have ol dumbass Joe decide to come in and run that place the next two years. The VP is President of the Senate.

[Secret Agent Man]

If the rinos and gop-e go along, what we have is the ability to control the docket. And basically block legislation/discussion we don’t want, and put up votes on what we do want, and can pass.

[chris37]

Your support of obvious enemies of America is disgutsing.

[chris37]

In fact, I’m not really seeing a whole lot of rah, rah ,rah go GOP in any of the comments to your thread.

You must be pretty damn disgusted.