Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Suffer Most Midterm Losses Ever Under Obama
Newsmax ^ | Sunday, 07 Dec 2014 06:58 PM | Greg Richter

Posted on 12/07/2014 6:25:43 PM PST by Olog-hai

When Louisiana Democrat Sen. Mary Landrieu lost her re-election runoff on Saturday it put Barack Obama in the record books as the two-term president with the most midterm losses for his party.

The record previously was held by Harry Truman.

Truman’s Democratic Party lost 74 seats in 1946 and 1950, while under Obama the Democrats have lost a total of 75 seats in 2010 and 2014. He could lose one more if Republican Martha McSally beats Democratic Rep. Ron Barber in Arizona in an election recount, Breitbart News reports. McSally is currently ahead by only 200 votes. …

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 2014midterms; billcassidy; democrats; harrytruman; highestloss; keystonexl; la2014; lmbo; louisiana; marylandrieu; midterm2014; miserablefailure; obama; opec; override; robmaness; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Olog-hai
And most posters on FR are whining that the GOP winning is a bad thing!

Ignoring the political reality of Presidential veto power they will whine and complain about the GOP no matter what it does!

41 posted on 12/08/2014 12:13:58 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

A liberal party winning is not, by definition, a good thing. The GOP establishment has a history of cooperation with the hard left, even more openly so under Obama. It is not a case of “no matter what it does” but the history of what it does.

And vetoes can be overridden with the Democrats’ help—if the GOP were indeed concerned about the country and worked on the blue-dog tendencies that some of the Dems would possess still. Remember, it is the establishment GOP types themselves claiming that they cannot act because of a presidential veto.


42 posted on 12/08/2014 12:22:39 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Yep. Lots of talk about shutting him down and zero plan to actually do it.


43 posted on 12/08/2014 5:52:53 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Visualize whirled peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The fact is that there are limits to power in each branch.

Sometimes we have to be patient.

The recent elections have removed most Democrats who would compromise with the GOP.

I am not saying it is impossible, but we can't overreact if we can't get everything we want right now.

For now, it is important just to have stopped Obama and to have taken back the initiative.

44 posted on 12/08/2014 11:18:02 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The last thing we need to is make Obama a sympathic figure!

The WH has power, and we need to recognize that power and the limits to Congress.

We are dealing with a Leftwing ideologue who was willing to destroy his own Party to get what he wanted.

We need to deal with him with wisdom and patience, knowing we hold all the cards, we just need to play them correctly.

45 posted on 12/08/2014 11:21:53 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

What Democrats would compromise with “the GOP” (their favorite Emmanuel Goldstein) much less conservatives? All I’ve seen over the past few decades is the compromise going the other way, as in liberal party compromising with radical-left party.

Have we stopped Obama? Why are so many establishment GOP types talking just like Obama?


46 posted on 12/09/2014 3:17:25 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
We have taken away his inititive.

The GOP Congress hasn't even been seated yet!

47 posted on 12/09/2014 3:19:27 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Have we? How?

We’ll see what the GOP establishment does. Right now, I’m watching them backpedal on their Obamacare promises and talking up amnesty.


48 posted on 12/09/2014 3:21:03 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The President has to go through the House and Senate to get anything he wants done.

Issuing an executive order for 5 million illegals not to be deported isn't 'amnesty'.

It is an temporary reprive, which can be undone with a GOP President.

49 posted on 12/09/2014 3:24:01 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

So the pen and the phone suddenly stopped working?

Issuing an executive order for any number of illegals to not be deported is de facto amnesty.

The Congress has already surrendered the power of the purse to the executive branch and violated the Constitution itself. Pre-2008 thinking will not serve here.


50 posted on 12/09/2014 3:33:22 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
No, issuing an executive order not to deport is not amnesty, it is a temporary stay in deportation.

You do know that executive orders can be undone by the next President?

51 posted on 12/09/2014 4:10:09 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

No, Congress hasn’t surrenderd the power of the purse to the executive branch.


52 posted on 12/09/2014 4:11:45 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

. . . and the sun rises in the west.


53 posted on 12/09/2014 4:13:16 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Guys like you would have griped under the Washington adminstration.


54 posted on 12/10/2014 2:00:51 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

You don’t understand the George Washington administration, I think. Washington would not have put up with such blackguards as Boehner, McConnell, ad nauseam, who are of the type to have sold us back out to George III, and who are also very far removed from the spirit of “No king but King Jesus”.


55 posted on 12/10/2014 8:31:12 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Washington was getting a great deal of flack in his last two years of office.

You can't make everyone happy.

56 posted on 12/12/2014 3:06:54 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Who said anything about making everyone happy? The point is to not make your political opposition happy, but your electorate.


57 posted on 12/12/2014 6:54:22 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The point is to do the right thing and get the right policies passed.

Sometimes it takes compromise, you don't get all you want in the first bite.

58 posted on 12/12/2014 1:25:13 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Where did Democrats compromise on Obamacare?

Conservatives have continuously lost ground. That’s reality. That’s because the GOP is a liberal party who pander to conservatives and stab them in the back once in office.


59 posted on 12/12/2014 2:08:06 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I didn't say that we should compromise principles.

There are ways that Bills can be passed without doing that.

60 posted on 12/14/2014 10:09:15 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson