Who are the victims here? Ping to Today show list.
Apparently, it did not stop Lena Dunham from lying her ass off.
Rather Rule: “Fake but accurate”
It made men look bad. So what’s the problem? Probably white men at that. A twofer.
"The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters.”
-- Tom Foley, Democrat, Former Speaker of the House
Just the A-holes that believe they can make up rape stories and think because they are female, that no one would question if it was true.
Is that a picture of Jackie?!?!?!?
To the radical man-hating feminazis, it doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. What matters is blaming males for all the crimes of the world.
You'd think Rolling Stone--after knowing about those debacles that ruined several mass media outlets--would carefully vet the story of the rape victim to make sure what she said was accurate before publishing the long-form article. But instead, the blatant political agenda of Rolling Stone overruled common sense, and in their rush to judgement to promote the magazine's hard-Left views, it ended up smearing a fraternity on the University of Virginia campus for all the wrong reasons.
In short, that UVa fraternity may now sue Rolling Stone for libel and slander, and that could end up costing the magazine its very existence.
GMA is actually correct, just not in the way they meant it. False allegations that later unravel WILL discourage other victims from coming forward. They have no interest in the truth; none. This story and Lena Dunham’s idiocy are perfect opportunities to shove it into the faces of every liberal you know. Be ugly with it, be mean with it, ask them how they would like it if their own son-brother-husband was accused. Bludgeon them with the truth. To do so is an act of love.
Fake but accurate. It’s the praetorian press way.