Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Rolling Stone failed in its story of alleged rape at the University of Virginia
The Washington Post ^ | December 5, 2014 | Paul Farhi

Posted on 12/05/2014 7:04:35 PM PST by MinorityRepublican

Journalists are paid to be skeptical and to distinguish facts from assertions: Don’t get too close to your sources and check what they tell you.

Rolling Stone magazine, it appears, ignored both principles in its explosive story, “A Rape on Campus.”

The 9,000-word article about Jackie, a University of Virginia freshman who alleged a frat-house gang rape, was apparently fraught from the beginning with gaps in basic reporting. The story’s writer, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, as well as a phalanx of editors, fact-checkers and lawyers who massaged the piece before publication, accepted Jackie’s account without locking down key details that would have confirmed, or at least plausibly substantiated, her harrowing tale.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: jackie; rollingstone; uofvirginia; uva; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: MinorityRepublican

So Sorry.

Unless the Rolling Stone and its reportette pay some heavy fines for this travesty what is to prevent them from repeating it?

An apology costs them nothing and will not prevent them from repeating this activity.

“No Pain, No Gain” isn’t limited to the gym.


21 posted on 12/05/2014 8:08:48 PM PST by Nip (BOHEICA and TANSTAAFL - both seem very appropriate today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Of the hundreds of colleges and universities here, I wondered WHY this leftist bitch of a hack fiction writer chose the University of Virginia as the setting for her destructive feminist fable. Then it hit me!
 photo 2651840770_5115c74be7_o_zps553bfec7.jpg

FILE THIS UNDER "ATTEMPTING TO KILL TWO BIRDS WITH ONE STONE"


22 posted on 12/05/2014 8:14:41 PM PST by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

But I thought Blair was with WaPo before NYT? So many scandals, hard to track ‘em all!


23 posted on 12/05/2014 8:19:52 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
The Washington Post reporter Paul Farhi in a bizarre statement writes, “To be sure, Rolling Stone was under no obligation to prove that Jackie’s account was true.“

Apparently the legal department at the Washington Post is no better than the one at Wenner Media. To call this statement bizarre is enormously charitable: when you accuse a specific person or persons of committing a specific heinous crime at a specific time and place, that is defamation per se, and there is no First Amendment protection against defamation per se. All you've got as a defense in that case is the truth, and you had better have some.

Rolling Stone doesn't. Wenner Media is toast.

24 posted on 12/05/2014 8:28:02 PM PST by FredZarguna (And damn'd be him that first cries, 'Hold, enough!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

“To be sure, Rolling Stone was under no obligation to prove that Jackie’s account was true. “

And this is why journalism majors make less money than your average burger-flipper, and have less respect and upward mobility too boot. Bonus: the burger guy isn’t holding back his 70K of student loan debt from his girlfriend.

Rolling Stone was occasionally capable of some interesting journalism, but that has been going south recently. This should steepen the decline. When the last of the burn-outs take the dirt nap and the wannabe hipsters grow up and get bored with it, the magazine’s finished.


25 posted on 12/05/2014 8:28:34 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

“I can’t understand why any girl would go to a frat party without a date, or better yet, with her own father. I recall being invited to such a party when I was about 20 or so and I was insulted just by the invitation. What’s wrong with these stupid girls?”

I think that depends on the frat, the school, and maybe the era. There were fraternities on our campus that were more respectable than I was.


26 posted on 12/05/2014 8:31:00 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Boy, you are right about the comments. TheComplete BS censors must be off snorting cocaine or something since it is Friday night.


27 posted on 12/05/2014 8:46:18 PM PST by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I can’t believe the Washington Post has the nerve to criticize anyone on the topic of journalistic professionalism.

I think this post says it all:

http://thefederalist.com/2014/12/03/dear-media-this-elizabeth-lauten-nonsense-is-why-everybody-hates-you/


28 posted on 12/05/2014 9:18:55 PM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
”Because of the sensitive nature of Jackie’s story, we decided to honor her request not to contact the man she claimed orchestrated the attack on her nor any of the men she claimed participated in the attack for fear of retaliation against her.”

Either that, or was it a story "just too good to fact check"?

.

29 posted on 12/05/2014 10:20:20 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Rolling Stone has gathered more moss than any publication in the last twenty years.

No surprise of this cackle of BS.


30 posted on 12/05/2014 10:22:34 PM PST by eyedigress (e(!zOld storm chaser from the west)/?s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

I read all 9000 words. She went to the party as the date of the supposed instigator of the rape.

Reading it, I was alternatively horrified and skeptical. The rape as described was not a close call. It was brutal, violent and clearly criminal. If it happened as described, there was no reason not to go to the police. She was brutalized and left bloody. There would have been evidence on the victim and in the room where the assault took place.

The worst people described in the story were the supposed victim’s friends who dissuaded her from reporting the brutal assault to avoid losing access to frat parties.


31 posted on 12/05/2014 10:35:43 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

I think the rapists were worse than the friends.


32 posted on 12/05/2014 10:45:19 PM PST by Lisbon1940
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: poinq

Great read. Thank you!


33 posted on 12/05/2014 10:46:57 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
To be sure, Rolling Stone was under no obligation to prove that Jackie’s account was true.

Get a load of this lovely quote. Oh really? Well if someone had the balls to prove this untrue, one would surely take Rolling Stone to court and sue their ass.

That being said, Rolling Stone has just did every rape victim a disservice.

34 posted on 12/05/2014 11:57:38 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Rolling Stone should stick to what it knows best; surveys of where the best drugs are produced...


35 posted on 12/06/2014 4:34:42 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

“I can’t understand why any girl would go to a frat party without a date, or better yet, with her own father. I recall being invited to such a party when I was about 20 or so and I was insulted just by the invitation. What’s wrong with these stupid girls?”

Heck, as a GUY I was repulsed back in the day as a freshman during frat “rush” week. All I saw were filthy houses and a bunch of drunks. I think the stupid girls went to the parties because they wanted to get illegally drunk for free.


36 posted on 12/06/2014 11:02:20 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

Your #4 are my thoughts exactly.


37 posted on 12/06/2014 12:52:10 PM PST by T Ruth (Mohammedanism shall be defeated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson