Posted on 11/20/2014 12:40:41 PM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
In a very political move, the president has announced new rules for a specific group of illegal aliens. If your parents brought you to America when you were under 16, if you have completed high school, or served in the military, and if you are under the age of 30 now, then you are most likely going to stay in America. ...
As for the policy, how can you blame kids when they are dragged to the US? It's not the child's fault that laws were broken. Thus the new policy is humane, and the President believes it will make America stronger. ...
The Factor welcomed Fox Business host Lou Dobbs, who argued that President Obama has overstepped his power. "This is the President," Dobbs said, "who six months ago acknowledged that he didn't have the authority to do precisely what he did today. I think he's going to be sucessfully challenged on exceeding that authority." ...
(Excerpt) Read more at billoreilly.com ...
Obama's move today (11/20/2014) in Nevada will expand the existing program for Dreamers, and there will no longer be a limit on the age of those who qualify. Lou Dobss said in 2012 that this would be successfully challenged. Sure it was... When and where did the GOP even challenge this. much less successfully?
Now the GOP has said that it is impossible for the appropriations panel to defund immigration. The RINOcracy apparently wants all of this almost as much as Obama does.
Don’t you just love Bill O’Reilly? /s.
BOR has a successful TV show.
He’s against the Marxist-Moslem’s amnesty.
Why try to direct anger at BOR for something he said 2 years ago?
Anger belongs directed at obama.
I would like to know or unterstand how they are constructing the argument that King Obama has tried for nearly two years to get something through congress.
I just don’t recall anything that affirms that claim.
WORSE YET OFFERING AMNESTY FOR NATIONALS FROM A COUNTRY THAT HAS CLAIMS ON OUR NATIONAL TERRITORY THAT COULD AND HAS TURNED INTO PROBLEMS FOR BORDER STATES CLAIMED BY MEXICO .
In a 2013 May 3rd speech Obama gave before the Mexican Anthropological Museum in which he blamed America for the violence in Mexico I believe he went even futhur. There’s a inference but never referenced by name to the Gasden purchase and border settlements US made with Mexico where Obama hinted he seems to side with the Mexican claims. Would those in attendence share that view is a question that should be asked, because I believe they would,.he does.
SOLVING THE ‘LATINO” PROBLEM A MYTH HISPANIC IS NOT A RACE BUT A POLITICAL LINGUISTIC CONTRIVANCE ...don’t fall into the hyphenated Americans trap created by the hyphenated political party ...The DEMO-COMS
The Mexicans have been getting most favorable treatment above the rest of our neighbors both north and south. They’re permitted to cross our borders and enter illegally and are allowed access to rights of citizenship (with the exception of voting which if the democrat party regains control over the House will happen) other nationals entering this country don’t get.. Worse yet the Obama government has been working hand in glove with Mexican movements such as LaRaza supporting the Mexican claims which are also supporting “Amnesty”.
Also by allowing Mexicans to do this any quota ration for immigration from other south and central American countrys are taken up by Mexicans while that country is laying claim to a large chunk of our sovereign territory is a recipe for later serious problems which are happening now.
ARE MEXICAN ILLEGALS SQUATTERS PERPETUATING THE MEXICAN CLAIMS ?
We are already seeing the result of this in certain areas claimed by the Mexicans. Their national flag (standard) gets displayed over ours. Where there is a controlling number of Mexican nationals (illegals). It’s displayed over certain institutions particularly schools accompanied by riots and disturbances. Blacks are threatend by Mexicans in certain sections of citys in those areas. We’re courting trouble by not placing a value on our sovereignty and our citizenship.
MOST COINS OF THE REALM HAVE TWO FACES WHAT ABOUT HOW ARE AMERICAN CITIZENS LIVING IN MEXICO BEING TREATED ?
Worse yet if a US citizen goes into Mexico never mind illegaly but legally. They’ll get 2nd class treatment. Land ownership in title is prohibited period. And there are a slew of regulations they must comply with. Which doesn’t apply to a citizen of Mexico
THE SOLUTION ASSERT OUR SOVEREIGNTY AND TALK RECIPROCITY .
By not insisting on reciprocity particularly on those who have entered this country illegally we’re offering no incentive for assimilation and we’re not easing the burden for our fellow citizens who for what ever reason decided to live in Mexico.
ENOUGH OF THE ONE WORLD SOCIALISM ...BRING BACK SOVEREIGNTY AND SANITY TO OUR COUNTRY .....BRING BACK BELIEF IN GOD ...THIS GOVERNMENT OUT OUR FACE..... OUR RELIGIONS..... AND OUR BEDROOMS..
L.J.Keslin
There doesn't have to be any truth behind a statement like that for it to eb effective.
|it is designed to give media whores and other Obama supporters a position statement to chant over and over until the STUPIDS hear it and believe it.
Please, no Red Herrings.
O’Reilly is a CINO, and were he a Republican, he would most certainly be a RINO.
Did O’Reilly help much back then? If he did, then say where on this issue.
If not, did his comments help conservatives or hurt their cause up until now?
Why not try anger directed at BOTH? Or is this an either/or and not a both/and?
Your article is 2 1/2 years old.
Get real.
And where have you been when many, many others have done “blast from the past” article here or brought out past info that still affects us today? Nowhere to be found is where you were at...
his humane obsession:
‘through no fault of their own...’
ignores the fact that its NOT MY FAULT EITHER
but bor wants to take money from a worker making 30,000/yr so he can pretend to be ‘humane’
Constitutionally and legally he's against amnesty. Emotionally and "morally" he speaks up for the side of the illegals and the enemies of our economy and culture.
You can't do both, but the weasel O'Reilly is doing it every night.
Sometimes I wonder if folks actually HEAR what O'Reilly says.....other than LISTENING to him.
This arrogant fascist with the cute leprechaun grin pulls this both-sides-of-the-mouth crap all the time.
Folks actually think he's a conservative because, like a blind pig, he roots up a truffle every so often.
He's actually an insidious statist and a consistent faux-morality, emotional thinker ....opining, in this amnesty issue as if the good Sisters are going to sharply rap his knuckles again with a ruler and flunk him out if he doesn't put in a good word for the downtrodden illegals every night.
O'Reilly is an anti-conservative (he calls us the "Hard Right" in moral equivalency with the "Far Left") ALL THE TIME.... and he has attacked our FR forum in the past as many of you know...... and he's a dangerous slickster, at that, because of his large nightly audience.
Leni
OK, suppose it's true?
Congress has "all Legislative powers herein delegated". One of those powers is to make a uniform rule for naturalization.
If you have power, it includes the power not to act. If you don't have the power NOT to act, you don't really have the power at all.
Ted Baxter started out anti illegal immigrant so much so, he had Michelle Malkin on to discuss the crap along the border that was going at the time. He’s since fired Malkin and needs a violin and crying towel at the mere mention of deportation.
Did I ever tell you, you rock?
We need to have a FReeper get together. We must have a strategy to hold the Pubbie leadership’s feet to the fire.
5.56mm
Yep...
Precisely. When he tries to reference Scripture to back up a point of view, it’s often down-right embarrassing to see his lack of biblical understanding and/or poor interpretation of what the Scripture is saying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.