Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TEXAS: New bill declares all federal gun control invalid and non enforceable
Ben Swan ^ | 11/14/14 | Michael Lotfi

Posted on 11/15/2014 1:43:20 PM PST by Enlightened1

"AUSTIN, November 14, 2014– A Texas legislator has introduced a new bill to derail the enforcement of virtually all federal gun control measures within the state’s borders.

Landreth has suggested that this could create a domino effect.

Introduced by newly re-elected State Representative Tim Kleinschmidt (R-Lexington), House Bill 176 (HB176) declares all federal restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms to be “invalid” and “not enforceable” within the state of Texas. It bill reads, in part:

A federal law, including a statute, an executive, administrative, or court order, or a rule, that infringes on a law-abiding citizen’s right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution or Section 23, Article I, Texas Constitution, is invalid and not enforceable in this state.

If passed into law, all government agencies and employees within Texas would be banned from enforcing any federal law in violation of the act. The prohibition on enforcement includes any federal legislation that:

(1) imposes a tax, fee, or stamp on a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition that is not common to all other goods and services and may be reasonably expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by a law-abiding citizen;

(2) requires the registration or tracking of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition or the owners of those items that may be reasonably expected to create a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership of those items by a law-abiding citizen;

(3) prohibits the possession, ownership, use, or transfer of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition by a law-abiding citizen;

(4) orders the confiscation of a firearm, firearm accessory, or firearm ammunition from a law-abiding citizen."

(Excerpt) Read more at benswann.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; feds; guns; law; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Enlightened1

Super move.


21 posted on 11/15/2014 2:24:42 PM PST by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

They may want to prepare for a flood of legal immigrants!


22 posted on 11/15/2014 2:26:43 PM PST by Steamburg (Other people's money is the only language a politician respects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Every state should adopt the same type of bill and tell the progressive elitetists to shove it...


23 posted on 11/15/2014 2:28:00 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Ping.


24 posted on 11/15/2014 2:35:13 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028
Overturned by 9th circuit in 3...2....1

That would be the 5th Circuit.

25 posted on 11/15/2014 2:38:30 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

headed to Texas ,

Ya’ll can go to He!!


26 posted on 11/15/2014 2:48:41 PM PST by Big Red Badger ( - William Diamonds Drum - can You Hear it G man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

That already has begun.


27 posted on 11/15/2014 2:49:28 PM PST by matthew fuller (Barak Hussein Obama (Benghazi Barry)- the first step into a thousand years of darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

I hope your trip goes better than Davy Crockett’s.


28 posted on 11/15/2014 2:52:32 PM PST by Nachoman (libertyarmstx.com is now open!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
That would be the 5th Circuit.

Yes, where several of the appellate judges have commented that among themselves, they own enough firearms to equip a small Central American army.

29 posted on 11/15/2014 3:07:16 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Had to start somewhere, so why NOT Texas!!!
States’ rights, here we go!


30 posted on 11/15/2014 3:22:25 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028
Texas is in the 5th Circuit.

The 9th Circus has no say here.

/johnny

31 posted on 11/15/2014 3:28:14 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

The Alamo??

Davey went out like a Patriot.


32 posted on 11/15/2014 3:32:00 PM PST by Big Red Badger ( - William Diamonds Drum - can You Hear it G man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
States did it for pot.

Cities did it for illegal aliens; “Sanctuary Cities”.

Exactly the examples I was going to cite.

33 posted on 11/15/2014 3:41:36 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer
I don’t see any criminal penalties available for federal employees violating the act. Without penalties available they will continue to act.

I think the point was for state LEOs to stop making arrests for violating federal laws.

34 posted on 11/15/2014 3:43:18 PM PST by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

LOL!! I remember that!
Wasn’t one of them asked once how many guns he owned, and he replied, “More than I need,not as many as I want.”

But to the article.
Would this nullify NFA34, GCA68 and the 1986 ban for Texas?


35 posted on 11/15/2014 3:56:24 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Vote fraud solution: Stake, Rope, Sugar and Bullet Ants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

The 2nd amendment specifically prevents the federal government from infringing on the right to own and carry arms.

The 10th amendment specifically reserves these rights to the states.

The 14th amendment specifically says all citizens shall enjoy the same rights.

What is so difficult to understand?


36 posted on 11/15/2014 3:58:58 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I don’t know. I guess Gruberized brains have faulty synaptic connections.


37 posted on 11/15/2014 4:35:47 PM PST by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer; All

“I don’t see any criminal penalties available for federal employees violating the act. Without penalties available they will continue to act. One of weaknesses of the Bill of Rights is that there is no penalty backing up all those ‘shall nots.’”

That was done deliberately. It is settled law that the federal government cannot order state officers to enforce federal law.

There have been several court cases saying that state officers cannot arrest federal officers in the performance of their duties.

The Feds just do not have enough officers to enforce laws locally, so without local enforcers, they are rendered mostly harmless.


38 posted on 11/15/2014 4:58:59 PM PST by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

“Would this nullify NFA34, GCA68 and the 1986 ban for Texas?”

It would make them very hard to enforce. Texas is looking better and better.


39 posted on 11/15/2014 5:01:25 PM PST by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

What’s the possibility of this actually going all the way in Texas?


40 posted on 11/15/2014 5:13:23 PM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson