Posted on 11/14/2014 2:18:10 PM PST by Libloather
For the past five years, a prominent Democratic operative who is a leading contender to manage a Hillary Clinton presidential campaign has maintained a private email listserv for friends and associates that carries a provocative name: the Mook Mafia.
The listserv, which one member said reaches more than 150 fellow campaign veterans, has been a means for Robby Mook and a close friend Marlon Marshall to stay connected with many of the operatives who would likely populate a Democratic presidential campaign in 2016. Mook and Marshall have both been mentioned as possible Hillary Clinton campaign managers.
Copies of a cache of the emails obtained by ABC News, and revealed publicly for the first time, show Mook and Marshall demonstrating an aggressive tone in rallying their friends behind political causes, in exchanges that are often self-mocking and sometimes border on being profane.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Not exactly breaking news.
Will the American have a GOP House ,GOP Senate and then Hillary ? D’oh why in the world would any sane person vote for that ?
Friday news dump.
Is this a current article ?
Why would any sane person have voted for Obama in 2012?
2008 can be explained based on ignorance, stupidity and lamestream media fraud. After four years of Obamanation, 2012 can only be explained based on mental illness.
"Mook." Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 14 Nov. 2014. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mook.
Chelsea's daddy?
“Chelsea’s daddy?”
No that is Webb Hubble.
It depends on how many fraudulent votes they can muster up from now until then. I expect the dead voters to come out in droves and well over 100% turnout in most inner cities.
Nothing these democrats do is ever on the level.
For those who recall Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and a host of others in "The Clinton Body Count," any mention of "mafia-style" by a Clinton operative should not be treated cavalierly, as WJC himself seems to do with his "Mafia bridge to the 21st century" remark.
Not surprisingly, the MSM writers of the posted article wouldn't touch that connection with the proverbial ten-foot pole. That would be the taboo of all taboos.
Fellow FReepers, please be aware!
SMITE....republicans?
reads like something out of the stinking koran
a democrack jihad...how appropriate
punish those voters. -— What kind of an idiot would put that in writing?
Sounds like a real sleazy bunch.
But who else would the Clintoons hang out with?
SOURCE Health Reforms May Hurt Uninsured - Study analyzes hospitals in California
THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE - Saturday, January 30, 1993
Author: Jonathan Marshall, Chronicle Staff Writer
Health care reforms under consideration by the Bill Clinton administration could backfire against uninsured patients, a new study of California hospitals suggests. A move in California in the 1980s to control the upward spiral of medical costs by encouraging price competition produced discounts of nearly 5 percent for paying patients, according to an analysis released by the National Bureau of Economic Research, an academic clearinghouse in Cambridge, Mass.
Price competition is a key element in ``managed competition and ``managed care scenarios being reviewed by a White House task force led by (a very ambitious First Lady) Hillary Clinton.
At the same time, however, the move to competition also slashed the amount of uncompensated care 36 percent from its expected value.
``The bottom line I want to push is that if you lower the price of care, it may . . . not be unambiguously good if it means kicking out the uninsured, said Jonathan Gruber, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist who authored the study. (snip) (no link)
Are you saying all democrats are scum like Gruber, Lieawitha, Hillary the IRS? Or that it’s OK to be thugs?
Is it OK for our side to do the same?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.