Pinnochio speaks
Of great consequence. He really means of no consequence..
Our historic agreement. Oh, it's historic, all right. Somebody is getting scammed on a level historically unprecedented.
If I were China, I’d by buying up all that coal this country (Obama and the EPA) are banning.
Which senators will approve the treaty?
Yeah, it’s a dead-on-arrival at the senate.
China doesn’t need to do anything until 2030 in this “agreement”. And we all know we can trust China.
They continue to push the CO2 scam despite it has been debunked with REAL science, logic and history.
Yet a big group of “STUPID” Americans will cheer this phony garbage.
I'm in solidarity with the Chinese Communists. See I even wear the same Clothes.
Just another way to waste money that should be either kept by the people who earn it or at least spend on national defense.
A commenter at the site said it best:
“”””
Baron95
Westport, CT 20 hours ago
Yes - we have come together.
The US cuts cheap fossil energy usage by 28% by 2025, while China continues to *increase* cheap fossil energy usage through 2030?
Yes, this is clearly reason to celebrate. We increase our energy costs, while Chinese industry and citizens continue to enjoy unfettered cheap fossil energy development for another 2 decades.
Yep, only Obama and Kerry could have driven such a hard bargain with the Chinese.
We need to pretend to solve this pseudo problem together because neither one of us can solve it alone. John Kerry continues his lifelong quest to charge windmills with nobody behind him, no science, no facts, just unsupported assertions by lawyers and paid scientists.
Nothing new here is there?
The goal is 10 years away.
And China knows that they will do sh**.
Why are St. John’s pant down around his ankles?
According to John F’in Kerry, the US and China account for about 40 percent of the world’s emissions. He says if the US OR China completely eliminated emissions it would not help.
So eliminating 100% of our emissions is useless, but eliminating 25% over the next 15 years will be effective?
For example if the US eliminates 100% of our emissions = 20 % of world CO2. This is declared inadequate. The agreement Kerry is praising calls for us to eliminate 25% of our emissions (5% of world CO2). If China agrees to the same (another 5% reduction) the total is 10%. So he is saying a
10% reduction is more effective than a 20% reduction. The man is an idiot.
It’s nice to see John Kerry is still an idiot.
More moronic pinko Bullsh*t from the brain-damaged libs.
Yo, Lurch. How about this, you give me all of your money now and I’ll think about giving it back to you in 2030. Deal?