Posted on 11/11/2014 12:44:00 AM PST by Secret Agent Man
The Cranberries prior posting about the gal singer who assaulted the flight attendant and cop was the last stupid straw about posting about guilt based on looks. (Note I am not a big Cranberries fan, I have no dog in this particular hunt - it's just an example.)
I am not against posts that discuss a person's looks per se. Particularly if it factors into the issue being discussed. If it's relevant, it's relevant.
What I am objecting to are the stupid inane posts that add nothing of value to the thread and detract from the reputation of this site as being a far better place than any liberal discussion site out there.
I am just so flipping tired of idiots claiming to be conservatives posting comments of absolutely zero value about the guilt or innocence of - almost always - a female person, based solely on her looks.
It's stupid. After being done a billion times, it's not even funny. Why so-called conservatives here think this is appropriate every time a female is in a news story that has potential criminal/illegal actions, what it really is is just tiresome. It adds nothing substantive to the thread. It makes the image of this place look crass.
And it makes light of actual crimes committed by people based on if they have breasts and vaginas. And it's entirely one way. Note we do not have thousands of post replies over the years discussing the guilt or innocence of male criminals based on how good looking they are. The female conservatives here (and the pervy guys who post all the time about females) have somehow restrained themselves from any posts of this kind, yet they cannot help themselves to go this way when there's a legal controversy with a female. Then it's find a photo, and let the idiotic guilt or innocence comment postings commence.
Can we just try to keep it classy here? Do we always have to devolve to appeal to the lowest common denominator of gutter humor here when women make the news for bad behavior/crimes? Don;t we have better standards as conservatives? Having a sense of humor is important, but why is it funny that a woman is innocent or guilty because of her looks? What makes this funny? Because ugly women deserve to be locked up? Because hot women can always get out of crimes or bad behavior and ugly women can't? This is the funny stereotype these comments are playing off of?
And when the crimes are sexual crimes, as they often are, in the articles these comments surface in, why should this be made fun of? Because there aren't any negative consequences that occur to a young boy or girl when an adult female decides to satisfy their sexual urges with usually an underage boy or girl? The same stuff isn't treated lightly or humorously when an adult male does it, in fact death threat statements and the like are posted. But it's all fun and games and smart-ass humor when a woman does it.
What makes it wrong is conservatives ought to know better. They do know that there are negative consequences to teens who have sex with adults, BOTH men and women. It's not victimless only if a woman does it. It screws up their viewpoint of sex and male-female relationships. In both cases these posters KNOW that it's wrong to have an adult authority figure having sex with kids they are in positions of overseeing. It's wrong for male and female adults to look at students as potential personal sexual conquests.
This is sick behavior for a site supposedly made up of conservatives.
heh.... funny.
The chemistry teacher in the video is Lillian Muller.
She’s 63 years old.
Still hot as blazes.
I don’t feel tardy.
2012 NOAH (PETA) Campaign
She is a PETAITE. Gross....
As long as it is still raining in South America then A-OK.
Damn, I just been bested. :) Good job. :)
The leg belongs to Anne Bancroft (who was married to Mel Brooks later!).
She played Mrs. Robinson in “The Graduate”.
Dustin Hoffman was the recently minted college graduate, Ben Braddock, that she seduces.
Here’s the info on the film (1967):
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061722/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061722/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
Here’s the link to the film information on The Graduate 1967.
It was shot in color. The movie poster was B&W.
Geez, that’s almost 50 years ago!
"Level 5: 'Someday I'm gonna marry that girl.'"
Oh please...its just fun
No one is stopping women from having their fun here
Have at it.
We like girls...a whole bunch.
Right. Well, how could her leg wind up in a painting of Napoleon? Some manner of gag for a movie?
I’ll put in a good word for you.
I’m getting tired of her, frankly.
(Don’t I wish!)
You Infidels never seem to get it right. We must always keep Muhammed (May Peace Be Upon Him) before us as an example of holy restraint of the sensual passions. Did he not wait until his bride was 9 years-old until consummating their matrimony, despite doubtless stimulation?
As to the jihadis in jail and any attraction to their female guards: that very same question just came up at the Lewiston-Auburn (LA) madrassa as we said our farewells to a group of young Somalis as they left to fight with ISIS. The answer is simple: if captured before completing the Jihad, these youngsters would almost certainly not receive the full complement of the 72 Virgins promised. Therefore, as night follows day in Islamic Logic, they would be allowed under special circumstances to make up the difference here on Earth with Infidel Female Prison Guards of the opposite sex, all the more so since modern ideas of penal sanitation exclude goats from the cell blocks.
You lost me there, pardner.
A painting of Napoleon?
I mean, Dustin Hoffman is rather on the short side.....
Some guy somewhere had to be tired of her #@^!. Sorry it had to be you! lol
And Allah Ta’āla Knows Best,
Imam Zat Amazal"
Hide yo wife, hide yo kids...dey Rakatin' and Salatin' EVYBODY roun here.
Now Imam THAT.
There are 13 pages of female teachers who “have been with” male students. All safe for work. But interesting. :-)
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/39783/
Is that a young Larry Bird after a hard night of partying?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.