Skip to comments.
First Presidential Debate in Works for Republicans
ABC News ^
| October 30, 2014
| By STEVE PEOPLES
Posted on 10/30/2014 3:51:23 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let me guess. The Republicans want to schedule the debates early so that Chris Matthews can be named moderator before his schedule gets too booked up.
2
posted on
10/30/2014 3:53:02 PM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Maceman
Gotta have time to line up all of the Marxist “journalists”
3
posted on
10/30/2014 3:56:08 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Can someone please tell the GOPee to go screw off.
They are not a part of OUR game plan this time around,
They can go straight to hell as far as I am concerned.
All they do is trash decent people and support the biggest RINOs they can identify.
—— ‘em! We’ve followed their lead to oblivion, even managing to give us Obola in the end. (twice)
4
posted on
10/30/2014 3:56:30 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Dunam, Duncan, man what infections these folks brought over.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No lefty reporters hijacking the debate terms, please. Let us select our candidate based on the issues that are important to us, not those of the radical left.
5
posted on
10/30/2014 3:56:39 PM PDT
by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
New rules to limit the number of primary debates.
I sincerely hope so.
6
posted on
10/30/2014 4:10:55 PM PDT
by
berdie
To: Oldeconomybuyer
While the Regan Library hosted GOP debates Geez, he was president for eight years and ABC still can't spell it correctly. Really??
7
posted on
10/30/2014 4:15:53 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why not provide fodder for the Rats to attack attack the Pubies.
8
posted on
10/30/2014 4:17:53 PM PDT
by
golf lover
(goingf)
To: berdie
New rules to limit the number of primary debates. ...in a desperate attempt to limit Rick Perry bloopers.
9
posted on
10/30/2014 4:17:56 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
the 2016 presidential primary contest. Soooo....Is anyone actively working on killing all the "open primaries" before they slaughter us again in the next election?
10
posted on
10/30/2014 4:21:42 PM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
11
posted on
10/30/2014 4:25:18 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer; All
What is there to debate regarding domestic issues? After all, one of the very few powers that the states have delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, to regulate an aspect of intrastate commerce is to decide policy for the US Mail Service, such power evidenced by the Constitutions Clause 7 of Section 8 of Article I.
So the Republican candidates are going to debate the price of postage stamps, right?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh Dear Lord please no. I’d almost rather have no debates. I’m still reeling from the 2012 debates.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Can we at least minimize this topic until next Wednesday?
14
posted on
10/30/2014 5:01:12 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: OrangeHoof
I have to agree...he made some doozy bloopers.
But if these people are allowed to talk too much...they all do, lol. It just makes me more aware of how vulnerable we are to idiocy. Sometimes ignorance is bliss. :)
15
posted on
10/30/2014 5:05:06 PM PDT
by
berdie
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Not this crap again. Make them go away.
First of all they are not debates, they are managed information sessions with facetime for the moderators.
Second they are an exercise in fratricide. They do more for the dims for free than any campaigning does.
Third. Republican party leadership should remove the wannabe's because let's face it, people are still saying "Who's Jon Huntsman?"
16
posted on
10/30/2014 5:19:17 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: OrangeHoof
...in a desperate attempt to limit Rick Perry bloopers.
No, it's an attempt to make sure their "moderate" candidates don't get to beat up too bad by the truth spoken by any conservatives running for POTUS.
17
posted on
10/30/2014 5:28:15 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: pfflier
Third. Republican party leadership should remove the wannabe's because let's face it, people are still saying "Who's Jon Huntsman?"
To the party leadership(GOP-E), anyone more conservative than Jeb Bush is a "wannabe".
18
posted on
10/30/2014 5:29:08 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
They better stick by their pledge of no Lefty moderators.
19
posted on
10/30/2014 5:38:21 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: SoConPubbie
I sincerely believe that the field should be reduced to two leaders by whatever methods then only those two debate.
And when I say debate, I mean they sit face to face then a moderator throws a piece of raw meat between them to see who is the alpha candidate.
20
posted on
10/30/2014 5:39:55 PM PDT
by
pfflier
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson