Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court gives go-ahead to same-sex marriages in Idaho
The Washington Post ^ | October 10, 2014 | Robert Barnes

Posted on 10/10/2014 3:12:09 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian

Edited on 10/10/2014 3:33:39 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

The Supreme Court on Friday night allowed same-sex marriages to begin in Idaho, ending a dramatic week in which the right of gay couples to marry expanded dramatically across the nation.

In a one-sentence order, the justices denied a request from Idaho Gov. C.L. Butch Otter (R) to delay the unions so the state could continue its appeals. The court gave no reason for the action nor were there recorded dissents.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; idaho; johnroberts; samesexmarriage; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: VerySadAmerican

Please see my post 59. Roberts was the clerk to conservative Chief Justice Rehnquist. Everyone believed he was a conservative, but he’s just a creepy opportunistic weasel. 99% of the conservatives on Free Republic praised his selection. Yes Roberts is a fraud but it says very little about the people who selected him.


61 posted on 10/10/2014 4:32:00 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I believe it will get even more personal when it hits my state. I keep thinking of that famous photo of the Frenchman frowning and crying on the side of the road as Nazi troops marched by. I expect to get a taste of that. Although, I won’t be frowning and crying. I’ll be gritting my teeth and wanting to rip some peoples’ throats out, and feel the joy of the warm blood beneath my fingernails. If anything could set me off, it’s this.


62 posted on 10/10/2014 4:32:54 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady
But what if say, 38 states banded together and said no to the feds?

I don't think you would get 38 states. Eight states (plus D.C.) have enacted gay marriage by votes of their legislatures (CT, VT, NY, NH, DE, MN, HI and IL); three states adopted gay marriage by popular vote (ME, WA and MD); and a number of states where it was imposed by court order have shown no real opposition to it (CA, MA, NJ, VA, NV, probably others).

63 posted on 10/10/2014 4:33:13 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]

64 posted on 10/10/2014 4:35:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I loathe Roberts! What a pathetic pansy he is! He’s the John Boehner of the Supreme court!


65 posted on 10/10/2014 4:37:50 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Same sex marriage will soon be a fact in all 50 states.

We shall become a gay, but not a happy, country.

Can it be reversed in the future?


66 posted on 10/10/2014 4:38:40 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

He wouldn’t be the first homosexual who was a “family fan.”

Jerry Sandusky was a “family man”, too.


67 posted on 10/10/2014 4:39:58 PM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: greene66; DoughtyOne

“You really think America even has another 20-30 years?”

The America I spent 25 years in the military for is already gone. When I look around me, I see a strange country full of strangers. I have nothing in common with most of them.


68 posted on 10/10/2014 4:40:02 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I don’t think you would get 38 states.

Well, I am hopping mad that they pulled this in Wisconsin.GGRR


69 posted on 10/10/2014 4:42:56 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady (Is the GOP actually TRYING to lose in 2014 and 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Indeed. And it’s a weird, surreal feeling. Years and years of pledging allegiance to the flag, and standing up for America, and all the greatness it ever stood for and represented, with every fibre of my being, down to the deepest pits of my soul. Yet now, I don’t recognize anything about the country anymore, and don’t really harbor any strong emotion or connection towards it. It’s become a distant country of strange, ugly depravity.

This whole vomit-inducing fag-marriage insanity is like the final straw that breaks the camel’s back.


70 posted on 10/10/2014 4:48:33 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yes, that’s true.


71 posted on 10/10/2014 4:52:49 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I think the big cities and the media are gone. Even in my state most places are Conservative. Probably 80% of the land mass is inhabited by a majority of Conservatives. My state is California.

San Francisco, Los Angeles, and a few other places rule the state. Most of the rest is Conservative in nature.


72 posted on 10/10/2014 4:54:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican
Surely there is a governor somewhere who is clean enough to not worry about being blackmailed who will stand up and say “I agree with Andrew Jackson. Roberts has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.”

YES!! What business does a federal judge have telling a state what its laws are supposed to be??

73 posted on 10/10/2014 4:57:28 PM PDT by NJRighty ("It's sick out there and getting sicker" - Bob Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Not to mention all the states that only passed their marriage amendments in the 50% ranges in the middle of the last decade. Heck, NC only passed its ban by 61% in 2012, every other state around there but VA passed them in the 70-80% ranges 6-8 years before.

Freegards


74 posted on 10/10/2014 5:04:12 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

We will amend the constitution after the revolution.


75 posted on 10/10/2014 5:06:12 PM PDT by iowacornman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I thought Roberts was a pretender. When I worked in D.C., it was common to see his face on television joining in at the big parties being given by the PBS crowd and oh, how the leftists claimed him to be the perfect conservative that they could work. I have family now that works in Washington. They tell me the politicians are into this scene. I realize they do not care to stop this.


76 posted on 10/10/2014 5:28:07 PM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It makes you wonder. Here’s another fine Bush mess. Sorry folks, but it’s the truth.

True, but a common problem.

Just about every republican president has had SCOTUS appointees who turned out to be disappointments to conservatives.

Nixon - Harry Blackmun (authored Court's Roe v. Wade opinion)

Ford - John Paul Stevens

Reagan - Sandra Day O'Connor

Reagan - Anthony Kennedy

Bush 41 - David Souter

Bush 43 - John Roberts


77 posted on 10/10/2014 5:29:03 PM PDT by Iron Munro (We can make it work with only one square per restroom visit -- Sheryl Crow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

and they call this a “conservative court”

lolz


78 posted on 10/10/2014 5:31:20 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

I attribute this as it relates to Reagan and Bush as not having as solid a team in the White House, as they should have had.

You’re in Washington, D. C. You’re going to have some folks appointed that are career people. Those people in Washington have been corrupted.

If these people get into the selection process, or the GOPe gets it’s ugly head in the tent, you’ve got problems.

Anything coming from Capital Hill is suspect also.

You would hope a full vetting was accomplished, but I’m not confident it’s up to snuff. I think that’s why we’re blind sided when the rulings come down.

I’ll tell you, I would demand a vetting process that looked at as full a record as was possible regarding these guys, and I would read a significant portion of their rulings myself before an appointment was made.

These man have massive impact on our nation. They can be a force for good, or a extremely negative force.


79 posted on 10/10/2014 5:39:34 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
The problem is that it is up to the State legislatures, or Congress, to write a law that will withstand Constitutional scrutiny. Heck, we can’t even get a law out of the 7th Circuit without Posner laughing at it (naturally, everyone blamed Posner instead of blaming themselves).

You miss the point of WHY laws started being written to oppose calling two perverts of the same sex that get their rocks off with each other marriage?

The 'laws' were a response to Leftists waging a war on self-evident truths and the historically time tested common laws, customs and institutions premised upon them.

Homosexuals are 'winning' because the black robes have moved the bar and pretty much muzzled the reality of self-evident truths and the historically time tested common laws, customs and institutions premised upon them which can be ignored now as 'irrational'.

You know what else is irrational? Those unalienable rights endowed by a Creator.

80 posted on 10/10/2014 6:25:44 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson