Skip to comments.
Poll shows Childers gaining on Cochran in Senate race in Mississippi
The Sun Herald ^
| 10/6/14
| Crawdaddy
Posted on 10/07/2014 2:49:06 PM PDT by WKB
A new poll shows Democratic challenger Travis Childers gaining on Sen. Thad Cochran less than a month before the Nov. 4 general election.
The New York Times/CBS/YouGov poll taken Sept. 20 through Oct. 1 shows Cochran leading 41 percent to 30 percent. A similar poll taken Aug. 18 through Sept. 2 had Cochran with a 40 percent to 25 percent advantage.
According to the New York Times The Upshot:
The YouGov online surveys are being used to supplement, not replace, the Timess traditional telephone polls. The Times/CBS News poll uses a different methodology for its political and social surveys; they are conducted using random digit dialing probability sampling. The YouGov data is used for The Upshot election forecasting model in key congressional races and Senate battleground states.
In each state and district, respondents were selected to match the demographics of registered voters. In 66 competitive House districts and the 15 smallest states with Senate elections this year, YouGov interviewed a disproportionate numbers of voters to increase the sample size for these races.
Public polling has shown Cochran stuck below 50 percent since the nasty Republican primary against Tea Party candidate Chris McDaniel, which is still being contested in the Mississippi Supreme Court, Childers spokeswoman Lindsey White wrote in a release about the poll results
Read more here: http://www.sunherald.com/2014/10/06/5840841_poll-shows-childers-gaining-on.html?sp=/99/100/&rh=1#storylink=cpy
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: childers; cochran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
1
posted on
10/07/2014 2:49:06 PM PDT
by
WKB
To: paintriot; Lil Flower; Malichi; WXRGina; duffee; onyx; DrewsMum; Tupelo; mstar; jdirt; ...
2
posted on
10/07/2014 2:50:13 PM PDT
by
WKB
To: WKB
I’m returning from CA the day before our MS election, but I’m writing in Chris McDaniel.
3
posted on
10/07/2014 2:54:10 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: onyx
Haven’t decided what I’m going to do just yet. I may do a write in and I may just leave it blank.
Not sure I can pull the lever for a rat.
Although I’m on his mailing list. You should join too. It’s entertaining. And it’s where I got the linky to this poll.
To: WKB
COCKROACH ain't got a snowball's chance in HELL!
The Conservative BASE is going to vote AGAINST him!
Here the latest from
September 19, 2014 (Excerpts)
" ... McDaniels lawsuit asked the judgeto declare him the winner of the Republican nomination
or to order a new runoff.
... Judge Hollis McGehee dismissed McDaniels lawsuit last month ...
McGehee had agreed with Cochrans attorneys in sayinga Mississippi Supreme Court ruling in a 1959 election dispute set a timeline for trying to overturn a primary loss,
and that McDaniel waited too long to challenge results of the June 24 Republican primary runoff.
... McDaniel is asking justices to reverse McGehees decision and order the judge to hold a full trial on the lawsuit.
... state Sen. Chris McDaniel, filed legal arguments with the Mississippi Supreme Court .... ... that current state law does not specify a deadline for a candidate to challenge a primary loss.
... that the 1959 Supreme Court ruling became irrelevant when the state Legislature rewrote election laws in 1986.
... Cochrans attorneys must file legal briefs to the state Supreme Court by Sept. 24,
and the two sides make oral arguments to the state Supreme Court on Oct. 3.
... Mississippi law saysa new primary could be ordered EVEN AFTER someone WINS the general election.
If that were to happen, a NEW general election also would have to be held. ..."
The writer of that article really chopped that information up into a way that makes it hard to understand exactly what happened and whats going to happen.
The "GOOD 'OLE BOY NETWORK" is working extremely hard to seethat this doesn't get done until the very last minute,
and working very hard to set it up so thatif McDaniel DOES WIN,that the "LOW INFORMATION VOTERS" will perceive it to be a "STOLEN ELECTION" by the courts.
I am SOOOOOOO DISGUSTED with Mississippi's "GOOD 'OLE BOY NETWORK".
God curse them all !
The
"ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" will NOT get the message
unless THAD COCKROACH LOSES!
It is VITAL that Thad is removed, or the RINOs will do it again, and they may do it again, anyway.
REMEMBER
MISSISSIPPI
I'll take out (vote AGAINST) an
"ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICAN" every time I get an opportunity to, and that INCLUDES the GENERAL ELECTION.
You got it?
"ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS"SHALL NOT PASS !
It's SIMPLE.
Vote AGAINST "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" !Vote FOR REAL CONSERVATIVE "Tea Party Candidates" !
5
posted on
10/07/2014 2:56:43 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Black Agnes
This is the one race where I not only would not vote for the GOPer, but would pull the lever for the Dem (it would be my first time ever in a national race). In a GOP state like MS, the only way to rid of Cochran is to double up the vote against. One less vote for the GOP and one more for the Dem. We’ll be stuck with Cochran if people just stay home or vote third party/write in.
If I was in Kansas, KY or anywhere else, it’s worth going with the lesser of evils, but the BS that took place in MS has to be dealt with.
6
posted on
10/07/2014 3:02:26 PM PDT
by
ilgipper
To: WKB
The ONE race the GOP DESERVES to loose!!!
7
posted on
10/07/2014 3:06:32 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qLDFiQcjlY Impeach Obama in 2015 !!!)
To: ZULU
The ONE race the GOP DESERVES to loose!!! I agree, but it still would be bad for the country if he did, and it would be selfish and childish to not vote for him. Get him next time if he is even alive in 6 years..
8
posted on
10/07/2014 3:12:56 PM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: Black Agnes
I may just leave it blankWhatever you do, don't leave that ballot blank. Too much chance for mischief in that already sullied election.
9
posted on
10/07/2014 3:13:12 PM PDT
by
grania
To: WKB
This is impossible because Thad Cochran is such an unimpeachable winner.
10
posted on
10/07/2014 3:13:22 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Proud to be Attacked by the GOPe daily!)
To: Yosemitest
So you’re luke-warm on Cochran?
11
posted on
10/07/2014 3:14:30 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Proud to be Attacked by the GOPe daily!)
To: Black Agnes
Yep. Leave blank or vote McDaniel.
I’m going to get a ruling BEFORE I cast my ballot, as to the validity of my entire ballot were I to write-in McDaniel.
12
posted on
10/07/2014 3:15:36 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: MrShoop
Hey I'm one of those selfish children voting for Childers. Can't wait to do it.
13
posted on
10/07/2014 3:17:41 PM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(Thad is a thud for me)
To: Black Agnes
I don’t think that I can either, and I will never vote for Cochran, so there it is. I think we’re at the point to where the saying “If voting changed anything, it would be illegal” has come to pass.
14
posted on
10/07/2014 3:17:48 PM PDT
by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: WKB
wouldn’t it be a hoot if Cochran in Miss and Graham in SC lost this election?
15
posted on
10/07/2014 3:18:30 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: onyx
Scuttlebut is they don’t count write in, they just toss them. I am being proactive and voting against that cancer in our party.
16
posted on
10/07/2014 3:19:20 PM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(Thad is a thud for me)
To: Yosemitest
Mississippi Supreme Court hears Republican Senate primary election dispute, October 3, 2014
( Excerpt )
... Justices spent nearly two hours listening to arguments and asking questions of both sides.
They gave no indication of when or how they might rule.
Cochran and McDaniel were not in court Thursday.
If justices side with McDaniel, the lawsuit could go to trial
and he could try to prove his claimthat the runoff was tainted by irregularities such as people voting in the June 3 Democratic primary
and then crossing over to vote in the June 24 Republican runoff.
Mississippi does not register voters by party,
but it bans people from voting in one partys primary and the other partys runoff in the same election cycle. ...
... McDaniel attorney Mitch Tyner said Thursdaythat state law was substantially rewritten in 1986
and doesnt specify a timeline for challenging results of a multi-county primary.
It is clear. There is no deadline, Tyner said.
Justice Ann Lamar asked Tynerif a candidate could challenge results of a primary 90 days, six months or a year later.
He cant just wait around 60 days, 90 days. That would be crazy, Tyner said.
His number one goal is to get his name on the ballot.
Justice Jim Kitchens asked Tynerif the general election would be the cutoff date for challenging results of a primary.
I dont know what the cutoff would be, Tyner said.
So now the question is,
WHEN WILL THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ISSUE IT'S RULING ON THIS CASE ?
17
posted on
10/07/2014 3:19:43 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: MrShoop
No, it will be very bad for the country to vote him in. Ends do not justify means.
18
posted on
10/07/2014 3:21:12 PM PDT
by
GilesB
To: Uncle Miltie
Oh, HELL NO!
I'd vote for the RAT (IF McDaniel ain't on that ballot), just to make sure COCKROACH LOSES !
19
posted on
10/07/2014 3:21:47 PM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Sybeck1
I’m going to call Chris McDaniel.
20
posted on
10/07/2014 3:23:08 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson