To: WKB
COCKROACH ain't got a snowball's chance in HELL!
The Conservative BASE is going to vote AGAINST him!
Here the latest from
September 19, 2014 (Excerpts)
" ... McDaniels lawsuit asked the judgeto declare him the winner of the Republican nomination
or to order a new runoff.
... Judge Hollis McGehee dismissed McDaniels lawsuit last month ...
McGehee had agreed with Cochrans attorneys in sayinga Mississippi Supreme Court ruling in a 1959 election dispute set a timeline for trying to overturn a primary loss,
and that McDaniel waited too long to challenge results of the June 24 Republican primary runoff.
... McDaniel is asking justices to reverse McGehees decision and order the judge to hold a full trial on the lawsuit.
... state Sen. Chris McDaniel, filed legal arguments with the Mississippi Supreme Court .... ... that current state law does not specify a deadline for a candidate to challenge a primary loss.
... that the 1959 Supreme Court ruling became irrelevant when the state Legislature rewrote election laws in 1986.
... Cochrans attorneys must file legal briefs to the state Supreme Court by Sept. 24,
and the two sides make oral arguments to the state Supreme Court on Oct. 3.
... Mississippi law saysa new primary could be ordered EVEN AFTER someone WINS the general election.
If that were to happen, a NEW general election also would have to be held. ..."
The writer of that article really chopped that information up into a way that makes it hard to understand exactly what happened and whats going to happen.
The "GOOD 'OLE BOY NETWORK" is working extremely hard to seethat this doesn't get done until the very last minute,
and working very hard to set it up so thatif McDaniel DOES WIN,that the "LOW INFORMATION VOTERS" will perceive it to be a "STOLEN ELECTION" by the courts.
I am SOOOOOOO DISGUSTED with Mississippi's "GOOD 'OLE BOY NETWORK".
God curse them all !
The
"ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" will NOT get the message
unless THAD COCKROACH LOSES!
It is VITAL that Thad is removed, or the RINOs will do it again, and they may do it again, anyway.
REMEMBER
MISSISSIPPI
I'll take out (vote AGAINST) an
"ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICAN" every time I get an opportunity to, and that INCLUDES the GENERAL ELECTION.
You got it?
"ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS"SHALL NOT PASS !
It's SIMPLE.
Vote AGAINST "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" !Vote FOR REAL CONSERVATIVE "Tea Party Candidates" !
5 posted on
10/07/2014 2:56:43 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
So you’re luke-warm on Cochran?
11 posted on
10/07/2014 3:14:30 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Proud to be Attacked by the GOPe daily!)
To: Yosemitest
Mississippi Supreme Court hears Republican Senate primary election dispute, October 3, 2014
( Excerpt )
... Justices spent nearly two hours listening to arguments and asking questions of both sides.
They gave no indication of when or how they might rule.
Cochran and McDaniel were not in court Thursday.
If justices side with McDaniel, the lawsuit could go to trial
and he could try to prove his claimthat the runoff was tainted by irregularities such as people voting in the June 3 Democratic primary
and then crossing over to vote in the June 24 Republican runoff.
Mississippi does not register voters by party,
but it bans people from voting in one partys primary and the other partys runoff in the same election cycle. ...
... McDaniel attorney Mitch Tyner said Thursdaythat state law was substantially rewritten in 1986
and doesnt specify a timeline for challenging results of a multi-county primary.
It is clear. There is no deadline, Tyner said.
Justice Ann Lamar asked Tynerif a candidate could challenge results of a primary 90 days, six months or a year later.
He cant just wait around 60 days, 90 days. That would be crazy, Tyner said.
His number one goal is to get his name on the ballot.
Justice Jim Kitchens asked Tynerif the general election would be the cutoff date for challenging results of a primary.
I dont know what the cutoff would be, Tyner said.
So now the question is,
WHEN WILL THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ISSUE IT'S RULING ON THIS CASE ?
17 posted on
10/07/2014 3:19:43 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
So, if (when?) Cochran loses the election, a new primary election could be held ... and *then* McDaniel could run against Cochran in a new general election ... and win. I'd be okay with that. I'd never considered voting for a liberal before. But ... there's always a first I guess.
23 posted on
10/07/2014 3:27:31 PM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Yosemitest
“a new primary could be ordered EVEN AFTER someone WINS the general election.
If that were to happen, a NEW general election also would have to be held. ...”
Absolutely critical. The primary must be redone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson