Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Congressman Warns Of The Real Social Ill Destroying American Values: Marijuana
Huffington Post ^ | Sep 26th, 2014 | Elise Foley

Posted on 09/26/2014 6:15:59 PM PDT by Mariner

WASHINGTON -- Conservatives are losing ground on the fight to keep marijuana illegal, a Republican congressman warned in dire terms at the Values Voter Summit.

During a conference mostly focused on religious liberty, abolishing the IRS and promoting small government, Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) delivered a full speech on the ills of decriminalizing and legalizing marijuana.

Fleming, a medical doctor, warned of a "growing acceptance" of marijuana -- a fact hard to deny, considering public opinion and state laws. Colorado and Washington state have legalized recreational marijuana, and 23 states and the District of Columbia have allowed the substance for medical use.

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: cannabis; colorado; johnfleming; libertarians; louisiana; marijuana; medicalmarijuana; pot; rockymountainhigh; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last
To: palmer
Or are you passing off as fact your speculation that the economic incentives of legal pot sellers are qualitatively different from those of legal alcohol sellers?

Until you have experience getting carded as a minor for MJ then you might as well drop that line of yammering.

So that's a yes.

I've never contested your factoid that minors can get pot more easily than booze or cigs

No, you didn't show the backbone to either contest or concede it - instead you omitted it from your replies in order to mischaracterize the obvious conclusion as "speculation."

Unfortunately your factoid even if true doesn't add any weight to your speculation that having lots of legal sellers will somehow crowd out the illegal sellers to minors.

Of course it does - minors don't have the purchasing power to sustain a significant black market, as witness the nonexistence of a significant black market in minor-desired alcohol, and legal sellers of booze and cigs usually don't sell to minors because their legality for adults creates a clear incentive to not break the laws against doing so.

MJ will remain easy to grow under your legalization scheme

And stoner teens are known for their green thumbs.

and it will be easier to obtain seeds depending on how easily the legal sellers get them.

So let's make sure that "depending" keeps seeds out of minors' hands.

As is the case in my area today, a couple kids will grow and supply and the rest will come from the Mexicans.

Are you claiming that a couple kids grow enough to supply a significant fraction of your area? That's hard to believe - have any evidence?

141 posted on 09/28/2014 7:40:07 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: palmer
2% drop according to the link, not very significant.

But a fact that runs counter to your speculation that "legalizing makes it more acceptable to minors."

Taje a course in statistics and get back to me.

Take a course in arithmetic - even "none" is different from "more."

142 posted on 09/28/2014 7:42:37 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: palmer
So, stats-meister, since you know 2% is not significant you must know the margin of error for this survey - what was it?
143 posted on 09/28/2014 7:46:33 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
Are you claiming that a couple kids grow enough to supply a significant fraction of your area?

No. I watched them grow about 7 or 8 large plants.

144 posted on 09/29/2014 1:55:13 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
It just says press release from Colorado https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe I searched and looked but could not find the press release.
145 posted on 09/29/2014 3:39:40 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: palmer
As is the case in my area today, a couple kids will grow and supply and the rest will come from the Mexicans.

Are you claiming that a couple kids grow enough to supply a significant fraction of your area?

No. I watched them grow about 7 or 8 large plants.

Then kids growing is not relevant to whether kids will continue to get pot if it's legalized for adults. As for the Mexicans: minors don't have the purchasing power to sustain a significant black market, as witness the nonexistence of a significant black market in minor-desired alcohol. (And legal sellers of booze and cigs usually don't sell to minors because their legality for adults creates a clear incentive to not break the laws against doing so.)

146 posted on 09/29/2014 9:47:18 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: palmer
So, stats-meister, since you know 2% is not significant you must know the margin of error for this survey - what was it?

It just says press release from Colorado https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe I searched and looked but could not find the press release.

Then how did you conclude that 2% is not significant? Were you talking out your, um, rearmost orifice?

147 posted on 09/29/2014 9:48:44 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You must be stoned. Do kids make their own alcohol?


148 posted on 09/29/2014 9:49:51 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Your complete lack of common sense explains why you are pro-stoner, a 2% reduction is not significant.


149 posted on 09/29/2014 9:52:02 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: palmer
No. I watched them grow about 7 or 8 large plants.

Then kids growing is not relevant to whether kids will continue to get pot if it's legalized for adults. As for the Mexicans: minors don't have the purchasing power to sustain a significant black market, as witness the nonexistence of a significant black market in minor-desired alcohol.

You must be stoned. Do kids make their own alcohol

You must be drunk - you already conceded that "kids making their own" is not relevant to pot.

150 posted on 09/29/2014 10:06:15 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Your complete lack of common sense explains why you are pro-stoner, a 2% reduction is not significant.

You previously followed up your claim with a reference to statistics - and as far as statistical significance goes, you've admitted you have no basis for that claim. You'll have to say what you mean by "not significant" - and how that means it fails to counter your speculation that "legalizing makes it more acceptable to minors."

Or you can continue to bluster and make no actual argument - your call.

151 posted on 09/29/2014 10:09:54 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
Kids making their own is relevant, I just don't know how relevant. Is 7 or 8 large plants relevant? Times however many kids doing it, I only saw one since it was nearby.

In any case your silly assertion is that this growing or other illegal sources will dry up once MJ stores open and kids get carded in those stores. Your evidence is that you were carded as a minor.

152 posted on 09/29/2014 10:50:29 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

If you can find a study that backs up the 2% drop, be my guest. Then we can look for the significance metrics. I did a pretty thorough search starting at the CO site and came up empty. Actually in your favor it is a 10% drop (22 to 20). But without a study we have nothing. That’s what most stoner arguments boil down to.


153 posted on 09/29/2014 10:54:35 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Is 7 or 8 large plants relevant?

Not as compared to all the minors in your area, no.

In any case your silly assertion is that this growing

I haven't claimed that kids growing pot will dry up - I've noted that there's no evidence that it's a significant part of the youth pot market.

or other illegal sources will dry up once MJ stores open and kids get carded in those stores. Your evidence is that you were carded as a minor.

No, my evidence, as I've stated at least twice already, is: minors don't have the purchasing power to sustain a significant black market, as witness the nonexistence of a significant black market in minor-desired alcohol.

154 posted on 09/29/2014 11:00:24 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: palmer
If you can find a study that backs up the 2% drop

You've previously implicitly accepted that figure by citing it while questioning its "significance" (whatever it is you may mean by that). Since that blew up in your face, you're now backpedalling to questioning the figure. Well, here's another bomb: "Thirty-day marijuana use fell from 22 percent in 2011 to 20 percent in 2013, and lifetime use declined from 39 percent to 37 percent during the same two years." - https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/news/news-new-survey-documents-youth-marijuana-use-need-prevention

That’s what most stoner arguments boil down to.

Evasions, baseless claims, and goalpost-moving are what Drug Warrior arguments boil down to.

155 posted on 09/29/2014 11:14:22 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: palmer

“Over 220 schools and 40,000 youth participated in 2013 Healthy Kids Colorado Survey.” - http://www.chd.dphe.state.co.us/topics.aspx?q=Adolescent_Health_Data [”About” tab]

Works out to a ±1.4% standard error for that 2% drop.


156 posted on 09/29/2014 11:26:08 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

That is the study I was pointed to. If you did not realize that, then you are clearly not paying attention. Ah, yes, we have a symptom!


157 posted on 09/29/2014 12:15:10 PM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

40,000 independent data points? You think 40k students chose to answer the question?


158 posted on 09/29/2014 12:17:21 PM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: palmer
If you can find a study that backs up the 2% drop, be my guest. [...] I did a pretty thorough search starting at the CO site and came up empty.

You've previously implicitly accepted that figure by citing it while questioning its "significance" (whatever it is you may mean by that). Since that blew up in your face, you're now backpedalling to questioning the figure. Well, here's another bomb: "Thirty-day marijuana use fell from 22 percent in 2011 to 20 percent in 2013, and lifetime use declined from 39 percent to 37 percent during the same two years." - https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/news/news-new-survey-documents-youth-marijuana-use-need-prevention

That is the study I was pointed to.

So when you said, "I did a pretty thorough search starting at the CO site and came up empty" you forgot that you'd been pointed to the study? Ah, yes, we have a symptom!

159 posted on 09/29/2014 1:05:07 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: palmer
“Over 220 schools and 40,000 youth participated in 2013 Healthy Kids Colorado Survey.”

You think 40k students chose to answer the question?

I have no reason to think they didn't - do you? We can't know for sure until the data is posted ... but unless there's a high nonresponse rate for that question, your claim about significance is on thin ice.

160 posted on 09/29/2014 1:10:11 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson