Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer
So, stats-meister, since you know 2% is not significant you must know the margin of error for this survey - what was it?

It just says press release from Colorado https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe I searched and looked but could not find the press release.

Then how did you conclude that 2% is not significant? Were you talking out your, um, rearmost orifice?

147 posted on 09/29/2014 9:48:44 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

Your complete lack of common sense explains why you are pro-stoner, a 2% reduction is not significant.


149 posted on 09/29/2014 9:52:02 AM PDT by palmer (This comment is not approved or cleared by FDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson