Posted on 09/22/2014 6:59:09 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I wish Pew had provided older numbers to use as a yardstick here. Cant tell if this has been fairly constant for a few years now or if opinion is starting to move towards gays on public accommodations as well.
The fact that more people support compulsion in the name of antidiscrimination than the right of the business owner to refuse for reasons of conscience is newsy, though.
Say, wasnt there another splashy poll by a famous pollster on this subject last year? Yep, sure was Rasmussen asked a similar question in June 2013 and found, no typo, that 85 percent of Americans supported the business owners right to refuse. Either theres been a sea change among the public over the past 15 months or, much more likely, the starkly different results are a product of how the two questions were phrased. Compare Pews question above to how Ras put it:
Suppose a Christian wedding photographer has deeply held religious beliefs opposing same-sex marriage. If asked to work a same-sex wedding ceremony, should that wedding photographer have the right to say no?
Not only did they mention that this matter is one of deeply held religious beliefs for business owners, which may have increased support vis-a-vis Pews blander phrase for religious reasons, but Rasmussen built up to that question by asking several other questions related to freedom of association and the right of groups to exclude. The question quoted above was actually the sixth in a sequence of seven; number five, for example, was Should a gay and lesbian organization on campus be allowed to require that all officers of the club support equal rights for gays and lesbians? If you say yes to question five, youre primed to say yes to question six as well for reasons of consistency. Thats a smart tactic for supporters of business owners. State antidiscrimination laws dont punish discrimination against all groups, only those that are especially vulnerable in the eyes of the state, but emphasizing that all sorts of entities are routinely entitled to exclude those who dont share their beliefs is a shrewd way to steer people around towards the right to exclude for moral reasons in operating ones business too.
As for the various subsamples above, the gender gap is noteworthy (if not enormous), as is the racial split. Blacks are sensitive to giving businesses the right to deny service to a disfavored group (at least vis-a-vis marriage), for obvious historical reasons. Hispanic numbers are almost as lopsided as those for blacks. The age split is dramatic, suggesting that as millennials replace elderly voters in the population, public support for requiring businesses to serve gay weddings will solidify decisively. The tilt among Catholics is interesting too, driven partly by the number of Hispanic Catholics but not entirely. Even white Catholics show majority support for forcing business owners to comply.
The very last bit, showing how opinion on this subject correlates with opinion on whether homosexuality is sinful, is more nuanced than you might think:
The public is more convinced today than it was last year that homosexuality is sinful, although support for legalizing gay marriage hasnt really fallen off. Last year it was 50/43, today its 49/41 although in February of this year, it reached as high as 54 percent. Hmmmm. Was February an outlier or has public support started to cool a bit? Also, although I already knew that Catholics on balance favored legalizing gay marriage (52/35 in this poll), Im surprised to see that a plurality of them dont consider homosexuality sinful. Forgive the atheist a possibly stupid question, but isnt all sexual activity outside marriage regarded as sinful by the church? I can see how Catholics might support legalizing SSM as a matter of civil law so long as the Church isnt forced to recognize those unions but Im not sure how gay relations dont qualify as sinful. Any religious readers want to help me out here?
Exit question: 82 percent of white evangelical Protestants, i.e. the conservative base, see homosexuality as sinful while 56 percent of Hispanic Catholics see it as not a sin. Are we still sticking to the argument that Hispanics are natural conservative voters who simply havent seen the light yet that the GOP is their natural home?
ALL laws ‘discriminate’ against SOMEONE!
No, hidden camera. Even the “outed” ones would leave otherwise. Those bars don’t get stings or even looked at. The laws don’t apply there, cops don’t go there unless called. I could go into the Dahlmer story again but you have probably read the account of the cops letting him take the naked, bleeding from the but and drugged boy back to his home....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.