Then we don’t kill him for the crime he didn’t commit. But if he didn’t do it, why did he steal his father’s guns? That fact stacks against him.
Oh come on now, if the press started that I stole my fathers guns, one or all of them, that would mean I was guilty of anything, including stealing his guns? You want to kill a man based upon what CNN has said?
I would love for you to articulate the 'facts' that stack up against him. For I have not seen or heard any. And then please tell me how these 'facts' make him or anyone proven guilty to the point of 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.