Concern over US concessions as Iran seeks to leverage ISIS issue in nuke talks

Foxnews ^ | 9/22/14 | Unknown

[Blood of Tyrants]

Republican lawmakers are raising alarm that Secretary of State John Kerry is putting too much on the table in talks over Iran's nuclear program -- as Tehran reportedly tries to leverage its cooperation in the Islamic State crisis in return for nuclear concessions from the U.S. and its allies.

The White House denies that any such trade-off is in the works.

"The United States will not be in a position of trading aspects of Iran's nuclear program to secure commitments to take on ISIL," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Monday, using an alternate acronym for the Islamic State. "These two issues are entirely separate."

[Blood of Tyrants]

Well, since the White House has officially denied it, it must be true.

[ScottinVA]

The White House denies that any such trade-off is in the works.

WEASEL WORD WATCH: Of course it's not in the works -- it's already an agreed-upon, done deal.

[Slambat]

“Well, since the White House has officially denied it, it must be true.”

Iran contra #2. Ol Jug-ears Obola and dumbs$$ #2 Kerry
will fall for it, If’ they haven’t already. For all we
know they did it a while back. Iran has been rather quiet
lately. It could be Mahmoud could be throwing this out
there for leverage, maybe eventual control of Iraq.

[familyop]

More concessions to the Iran-Russia-Syria-North-Korea-Venezuela axis.

[MasterGunner01]

Translation: Obama and Kerry are working to give U.S. nukes to Iran so the Iranian mullahs won't have to work so hard and to be “fair” to them. Why not, he got congressional approval to arm “moderate” Islamic fighters? Surely it's only fair to give them nukes.