Well, since the White House has officially denied it, it must be true.
To: Blood of Tyrants
The White House denies that any such trade-off is in the works. WEASEL WORD WATCH: Of course it's not in the works -- it's already an agreed-upon, done deal.
2 posted on
09/22/2014 11:16:02 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: Blood of Tyrants
“Well, since the White House has officially denied it, it must be true.”
Iran contra #2. Ol Jug-ears Obola and dumbs$$ #2 Kerry
will fall for it, If’ they haven’t already. For all we
know they did it a while back. Iran has been rather quiet
lately. It could be Mahmoud could be throwing this out
there for leverage, maybe eventual control of Iraq.
3 posted on
09/22/2014 11:36:27 AM PDT by
Slambat
(q)
To: Blood of Tyrants
More concessions to the Iran-Russia-Syria-North-Korea-Venezuela axis.
4 posted on
09/22/2014 12:29:44 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Translation: Obama and Kerry are working to give U.S. nukes to Iran so the Iranian mullahs won't have to work so hard and to be “fair” to them. Why not, he got congressional approval to arm “moderate” Islamic fighters? Surely it's only fair to give them nukes.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson