Posted on 09/17/2014 8:02:28 PM PDT by i88schwartz
MARK LEVIN: This is very odd. I just want to point this out. You actually have a revolt going on with the top generals and Obama. I'm talking about tanks pulling up to the White House and so forth. These men are trying to communicate to the American people that they are military men and we cannot defeat this enemy unless we use all of our armed forces and armed services. That's number one. Number two, Obama does not view this as a military action. He keeps telling us it's not a war, it's not a war. For him, the truth is it's about politics. It's about containing this issue politically for him so he can focus on fundamentally transforming America. And this is a very serious matter to understand.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
His loyal MSM will now hammer us through the mid-term with "Saving us all from Ebola," and "Mr. Tough Guy," (non-violent, of course) on ISIS. Along the way, he'll do what he can to topple Assad by arming the "Syrian Reformers and Moderates," and send Horse-Face to parley with Iran.
Once again, the Democrats are executing their basic game plan. No opposition on the field. No coach, no QB, no new plays. Senate, anyone?
why wait???
The most irresponsible president in history.... Now who didn’t see that coming?
10:06 Minutes
Obama: Fight Against ISIS “More Effective” Without U.S. On Ground - Mark Levin - Hannity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGwYkgh3s8k
You just made me laugh.... Big time.
Yeah, that comical part about Congress growing a pair.
The Founders understood what it may take to eventually remove a Despot/Oligarch/Dictator (Take your pick, or even of a different description that I have not listed), thus the fact of the Second Amendment.
If all else fails, we have that to fall back upon. Is it necessary at this point in time? Perhaps. If Congress cannot perform their Constitutionally delegated responsibilities for any reason, then “Tanks pulling up to the White House” is a perfectly acceptable alternative in the correct circumstances, IMO.
Sooner or later, something will break, and whether or not our citizens have the stomach to breach seemingly “unbearable actions” will be tested, and if we are not willing to start shedding precious blood in an effort to retain the Republic that this country is supposed to be, according to the Founder's designs after much deliberation (as long ago as this occurred, they were not provincial fools who had not been educated in the failed forms of previous governments), then we are cowards who do not deserve the freedoms and prosperity that has been bestowed upon us from those who decided to sacrifice to see this country constructed under principles that are currently being tossed aside and derided by those who are determined to “change” the very foundations of the principles that this country was constructed under and those same principles are supposed to guide us towards continuing prosperity and continuing freedom.
I choose to follow those who are ready to take the necessary actions that are required to keep us from slavery and “marxist ideologies” that will turn this country into yet another failed example of an absurd and illogical “Marxist Utopia”, if you get my meaning.
Thank you for your post.
Ditto.
Levin clearly said that he was NOT talking about tanks, but rather that the military leadership was finally showing some balls, after years of looking out for their careers rather than our troops, and telling the truth. I see they’ve persuaded Gen Allen to come back, so something must be up. I don’t see him agreeing to that otherwise, especially the way they tried to hang him out to dry because of his “inappropriate” emails to that Tampa socialite.
If and when it’s done, he’ll be loudly and abrubtly brought to Bethesda He’ll say it’s his heart and then announce he’s on medical leave for x months, then during that course they’ll [The Libs] feel comfortable announcing his resignation.
“There’s always affirmative action replacements for those Generals.
You know, those experienced Generals who have the right Color of skin.”
Yeah, it’s getting to look like we have a “military leadership” that was sent here from Zimbabwe.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, ....
Jefferson
Depends which war the turrets are pointing.
“I thought he said “I’m not talking about tanks pulling up to the WH” Anyone else see it?”
That makes a lot more sense.
bfl
The thought of tanks pulling up to the White House cracks me up. For that panty waist. All that is needed are some leaders in Congress with guts to start banging the drum. A steady drumbeat would get rid of the pansy community organizer. Unfortunately I haven’t seen any with the huevos to do it.
I’m fairly certain that’s why he’s trying to send them to the hot zone.
finish later.....
If tanks surround the white mosque I’ll stand up and cheer. If they break down the gates and go drag that damned muzzie freak and his entourage out in the street so they can be beat to pulps with baseball bats I’ll stand in line for a ticket and bring my own bat.
Maybe then some adults will take over and lead this country.
Check out the CG and lead non-com at fort lost in the woods, missouri.
I’m sure they are both imminently qualified though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.