Posted on 09/05/2014 7:10:58 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
Hosted by Bret Baier
Fox News Reporting brings you the untold story of the Benghazi terror attack.
It has been nearly two years since the fatal attack in Libya. Now, hear for the first time from the men who fought that battle.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I can’t wait,maybe after 2 years someone will ask the question Why was our ambassador in a country club surrounded by terrorists in the first place? Have not heard that asked yet.
If you get that answer you will know why they had to lie about the video,why they did not send any air cover or anything else
bitch bitch bitch
How many angels dance on a pin head?
Missed Greta. Back off of what? What did she "go after" them about? Thanks.
The State Department mouthpiece bimbo Alinskyite called these three warriors liars this morning about the stand down order they received on three seperate ocassions, then repeated the Obama lie that a stand down order was never given by either the State Department or the CIA or anyone else. BTW, she had her hair pinned back and wearing a string of pearls to make her look more “mature”.
Thanks!
Lol, EXCELLENT point!
Unless and until I am proven wrong, I will continue to believe the Stand Down order came from President Jarrett.
Ah, but if you mention what some of the vulnerabilities are, you are a “crazy conspiracy theorist” - even right here at Free Republic.
I question whether anybody can be that willfully blind, without a paycheck requiring them to act that way...
.........I agree and would add that in doing so they killed many jihadis that won’t kill, rape or behead other Americans or innocents.
I’m to the point to where I feel that KILLING as many of these murderous animals as we can should become national policy. If that means a nuke now and then so be it!
In Vietnam it was called “body count”!
Yes. Surely anyone who disagrees with you must be paid to do so.
In my dreams Valerie the wife of Miracle Max in “The Princess Bride” comes out of the woodwork in response to these people, screetching, “Liar!....”
And in my dreams when Obama appears the old hag from the same movie shouts, “Boo! Boo!....” and that whole spiel, complete with (adapted for Obama) “King of Putrescence”, slime, filth, and muck...
Somebody should do it. Should dress up as these people and give the appropriate response to the lying scum and then put it on youtube and make it go viral.
We always have to consider what motivates people to seek political office. Public service? I think that is unfortunately a rare motivation for most politicians. Most want the fame and stature, and once they taste that they need more. Politics attracts narcissists, and narcissists are dangerous people. It's that simple.
Elected officials should not be treated as celebrities, including any President. Reagan treated the office the right way. He got up early and put a suit on every morning - because the office was bigger than him, and it was an absolute privilege to walk into the Oval Office and serve in that role for America.
I saw an interview with Clinton once in which he talked about sitting at the desk in the Oval Office for the first time and saying “Can you believe this?”. I don't want to over interpret, but to me that sounds like ‘I did it. I got the prize.’. IMHO, the proper response to walking into that Oval Office the first time as President should be humility and a at least a small amount of trepidation about fulfilling the responsibilities entrusted to you by the citizens of America.
What we have instead are way too many politicians with the attitude “Do you realize who I am?”. They eat expensive food, drink fine wine, are chauffeured around, and generally treated just like they would be in Hollywood.
If I could change the system, I would require all Senators and Congressman to spend five full days each and every month holding office hours in their States/districts during which they would be required to have face-to-face one-on-one meetings with individual constituents (at least 15 minutes per constituent, one-on-one, private without photo-ops, but recorded). Choosing which constituent would be random (no cherry picking, but also assuring proper background checks).
Further, I would make it a mandatory requirement for every Senator, Congressman, and especially each and every President, to do manual labor of some sort for at least two days each and every month. I think a good place to start would be to make it a requirement for the President to sweep the floor at the White House a few times a month (again, verified, but no photo-ops). I'm very serious. When I hear how some of these people treat staffers, secret service etc., it disgusts me. If there is no humility, there should be no political office.
What is the most willfully blind a person can be?
Those who pretend the US is not at risk, in the face of all the evidence to the contrary, are more willfully blind than is humanly possible, IMHO. Especially if they’re in a place like FR where some of that evidence is constantly on the sidebar for all to see.
People can make up their own minds on what can be attributed to mere stupidity or ignorance, but in my opinion it’s a little bit like the saying, “Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence. Third time is enemy action.”
We’re now on - what? - maybe the 6th openly-known genuine conspiracy by this regime, all of them benefitting the Islamists and/or tyranny and harming the US and her Constitution and military. And certain people on FR have been on the wrong side EVERY TIME, claiming that anybody who thinks there is a conspiracy is nuts.
We’re way past the point of “third time is enemy action” on the people who are acting as Alinsky-ite apologists for the regime.
Name some names.
HG, you seem particularly sensitive whenever I allude to the fact that the regime hires people to pose as conservatives on social media sites.
Just an observation.
I don't know that "sensitive" is accurate.
I'd say more amused and intrigued.. since you seem to think I fit that category.
See.. I know the truth.. and when you display your paranoid ERROR in such an assumption it further demonstrates the absurdity of some of your theories.
Now..
How about naming some names?
Where have I said that you fit that category?
I said “seem to think”.. not that you said so.
Although it is abundantly clear that you DO think so.
Name some names.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.