Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

My own experimentation with air bubbles has proven otherwise.
1 posted on 08/28/2014 3:57:52 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: lbryce

Just curious.. what happens to the crew and passengers when a supersonic submarine hits something hard enough to breech the hull?


2 posted on 08/28/2014 4:01:20 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Sounds like a bubble in the bath tub

6 posted on 08/28/2014 4:14:12 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Bubbles are just for show!


7 posted on 08/28/2014 4:14:33 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Yep sounds like a lot of hot air. Heat of compression,combustion, exhaust, air up water down. Erosion/cavitation?


8 posted on 08/28/2014 4:14:47 AM PDT by Recompennation (Constitutional protection for all not ju st selectively for Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It is called Supercavitation.


9 posted on 08/28/2014 4:16:59 AM PDT by Perdogg (I'm on a no Carb diet- NO Christie Ayotte Romney or Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is. Writers of pieces like this should learn one word, if nothing else. That word is "scalability". Learn how to spell it. Use it often. The Russians have built and deployed torpedoes that sheath themselves in air bubbles, and they can go upwards of 200 knots, as I understand it. But only for a short distance.

Shanghai to San Francisco is 6145 statute miles, along a great circle route, which would call for the submarine to burrow its way through Japan on the way to the West Coast. Also, in order to make this trip in the advertised 100 minutes, it would have to travel at 3840 mph, or almost twice the speed of an SR-71.

This is not on my Short List of Things to Worry About.

10 posted on 08/28/2014 4:21:12 AM PDT by Pecos (Kakistocracy - killing the Constitution, one step at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

The Russians did this with a sort of under water missile. Problem was it was point and shoot. It couldn’t maneuver well. Seems putting people on something like that is suicidal.


11 posted on 08/28/2014 4:22:31 AM PDT by ryan71 (The Partisans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It works for torpedos so they may be able to adapt it for larger scale but the amount of energy needed would be enormous. There is also the issue of transitioning from 1200 fps to regular speed. If not done carefully the sudden slow down would plaster the crew against the hull. I wonder if China is working on an inertial dampening system?


12 posted on 08/28/2014 4:25:01 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Captain Sun Ting Wong

Navigator Wi Tu Lo

Chief Petty Officer Ho Lee Fuk

First Mate Bang Ding Ow


14 posted on 08/28/2014 4:26:28 AM PDT by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

They’re working on a way to get troops in large numbers over here in a hurry. When they do, we’re going to find out that Sum Ting Wong. Just wait and see.


17 posted on 08/28/2014 4:32:52 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Good in theory but. No matter what you do to reduce friction you still have to push a lot of water out of the way. To move the boat forward one boat length, that is the equivalent to the displacement. That takes energy to move xxx tons of water. Now figure how many boat lengths it has to move per second at supersonic speeds. ... You get close to an energy rate (power) figure. As Scotty says ya canna violate the laws of physics captain.


22 posted on 08/28/2014 4:48:48 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

Supersonic speed = 768+ mph. Yea, in a boat. Crewed by Chinese.
What could go wrong? :-o


27 posted on 08/28/2014 5:01:36 AM PDT by 9422WMR ("Ignorance can be cured by education, but stupidity is forever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

This would be impossible, impractical, and expensive for subs. For a new class of intermediate range nuclear devices... maybe not so much.


29 posted on 08/28/2014 5:04:22 AM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

3000+ MPH submarine, huh? Impressive.

/snort


31 posted on 08/28/2014 5:06:34 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce
Didn't the Russkis try something like this, maybe a flying submarine tank or some such idiocy? Ok, not a tank, but it failed miserably anyways. I still chuckle over one of the raghead goon squads that built a scale model of a CVN and launched a sub to devise attack routines, but the sub sank. Brilliant!

I swear, the so-called civilizations of the world are constantly working to devise new ways to run, control or destroy the world. I say anyone who actively WANTS control is exactly the type of person who should be kept as far away from the levers of control as possible. Too much enthusiasm is not a good thing in some matters. Politicians and rabid cop wannabees are two examples come to mind first.

32 posted on 08/28/2014 5:07:41 AM PDT by W. (Government: Moving at the speed of paperpushers pushing actual paper, until it benefits them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It’s first practical application will be as an unmanned weapon. If they are already talking about using it as a means of conveyance, my first question is “How far along is the weapon?”


41 posted on 08/28/2014 5:28:56 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

I’m sure a hypersonic submarine would have no effect on living creatures in the water within five or ten miles.


42 posted on 08/28/2014 5:30:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The man who damns money obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it earned it." --Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

sick PETA on their asses.
This can’t be good for fish.


44 posted on 08/28/2014 5:33:44 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

um.... if you put a vehicle in an air bubble, wouldn’t it tend to fall to the bottom unless it has some sort of air propulsion system in addition to it’s water propulsion?


45 posted on 08/28/2014 5:40:30 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lbryce

It’s the same basis as when you fart in a swimming pool and fall to the bottom.


47 posted on 08/28/2014 5:56:20 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson