Skip to comments.Richard Dawkins: choosing NOT to abort baby with Down syndrome is ‘immoral’
Posted on 08/20/2014 1:15:30 PM PDT by wagglebee
In a bizarre rant on Twitter earlier today, atheist Richard Dawkins wrote that choosing not to abort a child with Down Syndrome would be "immoral."
The conversation started when Dawkins tweeted that "Ireland is a civilised country except in this 1 area." The area was abortion, which until last year was illegal in all cases.
A Twitter user then asked Dawkins if "994 human beings with Down's Syndrome [having been] deliberately killed before birth in England and Wales in 2012" was "civilised."
Dawkins replied "yes, it is very civilised. These are fetuses, diagnosed before they have human feelings."
Apparently I'm a horrid monster for recommending WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS to the great majority of Down Syndrome fetuses. They are aborted. — Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) August 20, 2014
.@AidanMcCourt Yes, it is very civilised. These are fetuses, diagnosed before they have human feelings. — Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) August 20, 2014
Later, Dawkins said that "the question is not ‘is it 'human'?’ but ‘can it SUFFER?’"
In perhaps the most shocking moment, one Twitter user wrote that he or she "honestly [doesn't] know what I would do if I were pregnant with a kid with Down Syndrome. Real ethical dilemma."
Dawkins advised the writer to "abort it and try again. It would be immoral to bring it into the world if you have the choice."
According to Dawkins, the issue of who should be born comes down to a calculation based upon possible suffering. "Yes. Suffering should be avoided. [The abortion] cause[s] no suffering. Reduce suffering wherever you can."
Later, however, he said that people on the autism spectrum "have a great deal to contribute, Maybe even an enhanced ability in some respects. [Down Syndrome] not enhanced."
When Dawkins received some blowback from Twitter followers, he replied: "Apparently I'm a horrid monster for recommending WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS to the great majority of Down Syndrome fetuses. They are aborted."
It is estimated that in many Western countries the abortion rate of children diagnosed in utero with Down syndrome is 90%, or even higher. The development of new and more accurate tests for the condition has raised concerns among Down syndrome advocates that that number could rise even higher.
Although it is widely believed that people with Down syndrome are doomed to a life of suffering, in one large survey 99% of respondents with Down syndrome said they were "happy." At the same time, 99% percent of parents said they loved their child with Down syndrome, and 97 percent said they were proud of them.
Only 4 percent of parents who responded said they regretted having their child.
A number of Dawkins' statements in the Twitter thread about fetal development are at odds with scientific realities. For example, it is well-established that 20 weeks into a pregnancy, unborn children can feel pain. Likewise, unborn children have emotional reactions to external stimuli -- such as a mother's stress levels -- months before being born.
What a bastard.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
I wouldn’t want to be alone with him in an elevator. He’s frightening.
What if his mama believed in abortion?
Listening to Richard Dawkins is immoral.
Especially if you have ds
Because he's God?
Listening to you Dawkins is IMMORAL
Stunning! A man of his learning and he has no idea what the functions of the brain and spinal cord are, no clue what a nervous system is! I’m shocked; disgusted, too, to be sure, but shocked beyond belief!
Logical consequence of believing in “SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST”.
Strange that an atheist should tell the rest of us what is moral and immoral. If there is no God then nothing is immoral.
Who made Richard Dawkins God?
So is refusing to abort a baby carrying LGD genes.
His comments prove intelligence does not insure humanity. Aborting Down’s babies is itself immoral, doubly so for refusing to allow a doubly vulnerable the right to life.
The instant that God is declared dead, and science is the new god - huge extermination plans start taking place. Soon they will be killing based on amniotic gene analysis.
Didn’t we already see the Eugenicists and Nazis do this. It ended badly.
Those who refuse to learn from the mistakes of the past are condemned to repeat them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.