Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key West Gay Couple That Can't Marry: "Love is Love. That's All That Matters."
New Times ^ | 7/22/14

Posted on 07/22/2014 6:30:49 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

A Monroe County judge yesterday said a Key West couple can't marry despite his ruling that Florida's ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional. Chief Judge Luis Garcia said in an appeal by the state of Florida, "The automatic stay, currently in place, shall remain in place until completion of appellate proceedings or until further order of this Court."

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.browardpalmbeach.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: centurion316

Could it be that the Left has discovered that the government subsidizes marriage and what this couple really wants to do is to cash in on the free stuff?

...think ‘estate tax laws’ and you have your answer...


21 posted on 07/22/2014 7:35:06 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Spare me this hyperbolic nonsense! All this "couple" need do is travel to any of the 19 states (at last count) where gay marriage has been made legal or (like ours) where the gutless governor has decided not to appeal the judicial fiat ruling where it has been declared legal. Then, they can have their make-believe wedding and get a real legal certificate to prove it.

It isn't about the "right" to marry. It never was. It is about imposing the pervert agenda everywhere.

22 posted on 07/22/2014 7:36:01 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Barf alert STAT!


23 posted on 07/22/2014 7:37:35 AM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Last time I checked, homosexual buggery did not beget children.

...no, but fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities do...


24 posted on 07/22/2014 7:37:41 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"LGBT youth... are not only at risk of being victims of hate crimes but are also at an increased risk of self-hate offenses -- such as self-mutilation..."

That's the very definition of a tranny.

But if I pointed that out, my guess is I'd be the one who'd be called a hater.

25 posted on 07/22/2014 7:37:52 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (A Buddhist goes over to a hot-dog vendor and says, "Make me one with everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
What a cute couple ...
26 posted on 07/22/2014 7:38:14 AM PDT by shove_it (My real nickname is Otter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
"Love is love. That's all that matters."

If that's all that matters, why do they insist on sodomizing each other?

27 posted on 07/22/2014 7:39:30 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (A Buddhist goes over to a hot-dog vendor and says, "Make me one with everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shove_it

They look like they could be brothers. Narcissism defined. In love with their own reflections.


28 posted on 07/22/2014 7:43:33 AM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

Narcissism defined. In love with their own reflections.

...must be the feel of all that stubble scraping their cheeks as they engage in deep, longing tongueplay...


29 posted on 07/22/2014 7:49:20 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
So let them marry "fecund women trolling for 'surrogacy' opportunities".

Buggering each other in the butt is just going to make a stinky mess ... not a baby.

30 posted on 07/22/2014 7:53:05 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

‘All you need is love,
All you need is love,
All you need is love, love
Love is all you need!’

What nonsense.


31 posted on 07/22/2014 8:18:49 AM PDT by x1stcav (Leftism is like rust. It corrodes twenty-four hous a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

So let them marry “fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities”.

...I see the point of my post completely eluded you...

...but you certainly do see, I’m sure, that these two, or any other like couple, can ‘naturally have’ all the children they wish, just by paying women to carry the child to term...they can go ‘forth and multiply’ the same way anyone else does, completely apart from whether they bugger each other or not...

...they can ‘marry’ each other, be completely chaste, and have natural children...all of which becomes a business opportunity with the mainstreaming of the surrogacy line of work...


32 posted on 07/22/2014 8:38:49 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Puke


33 posted on 07/22/2014 8:42:44 AM PDT by informavoracious (Open your eyes, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
They can do all of those things without going through some sort of mockery of marriage. A "marriage" involving the two of them has nothing to do with going forth and multiplying. It has only to do with them sodomizing each other. Any "multiplying" either of them might do necessarily involves a third party.

Some actual couples (1 man, 1 woman) are unable to conceive because of injury, illness, age or defect. These couples are unable to conceive due to accident, not to nature. In the abstract, a couple made of 1 man and 1 woman can beget children.

With these two, or with any same sex pair, it is not so. A same sex pair's absolute inability to beget children with each other is a matter of nature: they are both male (or both female). Even in the abstract, they are unable to procreate together.

I'm sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.

34 posted on 07/22/2014 8:55:58 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I’m sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.

...yeah, I do see the difference...and as regards the ‘marriage mockery’ issue, civil unions were the perfect answer...however, such unions did not address the social benefits afforded traditional marriage, so these people deemed that their ‘marriages’ counted the same, so communal assets can be transferred with as little trouble as possible...but the sad point in fact is, that since we fall all over ourselves to be inclusive, we mainstream such practices as ‘maternal surrogates’, along with artificial insemination, and voila, inability to procreate is no longer an issue...and buggery itself becomes a completely moot point...

...btw, we may infer that these two twinkies are buggering each other, but we do not know that...I fervently hope that
they are chaste, because the thought of these two ‘good ol boys’ kissing and caressing is a truly barfable moment...


35 posted on 07/22/2014 10:15:05 AM PDT by IrishBrigade (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

No one state currently stops two people of either genders to shack up together.

So why the complaining from these lobbies... well because it all about the POWER...


36 posted on 07/22/2014 2:24:56 PM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson