[IrishBrigade]

So let them marry “fecund women trolling for ‘surrogacy’ opportunities”.

...I see the point of my post completely eluded you...

...but you certainly do see, I’m sure, that these two, or any other like couple, can ‘naturally have’ all the children they wish, just by paying women to carry the child to term...they can go ‘forth and multiply’ the same way anyone else does, completely apart from whether they bugger each other or not...

...they can ‘marry’ each other, be completely chaste, and have natural children...all of which becomes a business opportunity with the mainstreaming of the surrogacy line of work...

[NorthMountain]

They can do all of those things without going through some sort of mockery of marriage. A "marriage" involving the two of them has nothing to do with going forth and multiplying. It has only to do with them sodomizing each other. Any "multiplying" either of them might do necessarily involves a third party.

Some actual couples (1 man, 1 woman) are unable to conceive because of injury, illness, age or defect. These couples are unable to conceive due to accident, not to nature. In the abstract, a couple made of 1 man and 1 woman can beget children.

With these two, or with any same sex pair, it is not so. A same sex pair's absolute inability to beget children with each other is a matter of nature: they are both male (or both female). Even in the abstract, they are unable to procreate together.

I'm sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.