Some actual couples (1 man, 1 woman) are unable to conceive because of injury, illness, age or defect. These couples are unable to conceive due to accident, not to nature. In the abstract, a couple made of 1 man and 1 woman can beget children.
With these two, or with any same sex pair, it is not so. A same sex pair's absolute inability to beget children with each other is a matter of nature: they are both male (or both female). Even in the abstract, they are unable to procreate together.
I'm sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.
I’m sure you see the difference between a sexual pair which in the abstract can beget children, and a homosex pair which in the abstract cannot.
...yeah, I do see the difference...and as regards the ‘marriage mockery’ issue, civil unions were the perfect answer...however, such unions did not address the social benefits afforded traditional marriage, so these people deemed that their ‘marriages’ counted the same, so communal assets can be transferred with as little trouble as possible...but the sad point in fact is, that since we fall all over ourselves to be inclusive, we mainstream such practices as ‘maternal surrogates’, along with artificial insemination, and voila, inability to procreate is no longer an issue...and buggery itself becomes a completely moot point...
...btw, we may infer that these two twinkies are buggering each other, but we do not know that...I fervently hope that
they are chaste, because the thought of these two ‘good ol boys’ kissing and caressing is a truly barfable moment...